From: Steve Ellcey <sje@cup.hp.com>
To: drow@false.org
Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Another HP-UX IA64 Build patch
Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 17:55:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200505051751.KAA17543@hpsje.cup.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050505173236.GA17480@nevyn.them.org>
> This is wrong. If your system headers have a conflicting prototype,
> you will lose, regardless of what compiler you're using.
>
> Do you really not have a prototype for basename?
>
> --
> Daniel Jacobowitz
> CodeSourcery, LLC
Yes, I have a prototype for basename on IA64 HP-UX. It is in
/usr/include/libgen.h:
extern char *basename(char *);
I see it doesn't have the const modifier that libiberty has. I didn't
get a warning or error presumbably because the build didn't include
libgen.h.
The problem I was trying to avoid is with PA HP-UX. It has the same
prototype but if someone is trying to build binutils with the bundled
HP-UX compiler, that compiler doesn't handle prototypes. It is an old
K&R compiler that is really just intended to be used to rebuild the
kernel. The real HP compiler that people can buy is, of course, a full
ANSI C compiler. But it looks like we require a full ANSI compiler to
build binutils now, I see all the uses of PARAM are gone now so I guess
I don't need to worry about that scenario anymore.
So should I just add __hpux__ to the list of OS's or is the difference
between 'char *' and 'const char *' going to bite me somewhere that I
haven't seen yet?
Steve Ellcey
sje@cup.hp.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-05 17:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-05 17:26 Steve Ellcey
2005-05-05 17:41 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-05 17:55 ` Steve Ellcey [this message]
2005-05-05 18:12 ` James E Wilson
2005-05-05 18:16 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-05 19:17 ` James E Wilson
2005-05-05 19:32 ` DJ Delorie
2005-05-05 19:47 ` James E Wilson
2005-05-05 21:40 ` Andreas Schwab
2005-05-05 21:43 ` DJ Delorie
2005-05-05 18:10 ` James E Wilson
2005-05-05 20:12 ` James E Wilson
2005-05-05 20:42 ` Steve Ellcey
2005-05-05 21:36 ` DJ Delorie
2005-05-05 21:41 ` James E Wilson
2005-05-05 22:46 ` DJ Delorie
2005-05-06 1:57 ` James E Wilson
2005-05-06 1:58 ` DJ Delorie
2005-05-09 23:28 ` Steve Ellcey
2005-05-09 23:33 ` DJ Delorie
2005-05-12 16:37 ` Steve Ellcey
2005-05-05 22:06 ` James E Wilson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200505051751.KAA17543@hpsje.cup.hp.com \
--to=sje@cup.hp.com \
--cc=binutils@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=drow@false.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).