public inbox for binutils@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steve Ellcey <sje@cup.hp.com>
To: drow@false.org
Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Another HP-UX IA64 Build patch
Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 17:55:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200505051751.KAA17543@hpsje.cup.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050505173236.GA17480@nevyn.them.org>

> This is wrong.  If your system headers have a conflicting prototype,
> you will lose, regardless of what compiler you're using.
> 
> Do you really not have a prototype for basename?
> 
> -- 
> Daniel Jacobowitz
> CodeSourcery, LLC

Yes, I have a prototype for basename on IA64 HP-UX.  It is in
/usr/include/libgen.h:

extern char *basename(char *);

I see it doesn't have the const modifier that libiberty has.  I didn't
get a warning or error presumbably because the build didn't include
libgen.h.

The problem I was trying to avoid is with PA HP-UX.  It has the same
prototype but if someone is trying to build binutils with the bundled
HP-UX compiler, that compiler doesn't handle prototypes.  It is an old
K&R compiler that is really just intended to be used to rebuild the
kernel.  The real HP compiler that people can buy is, of course, a full
ANSI C compiler.  But it looks like we require a full ANSI compiler to
build binutils now, I see all the uses of PARAM are gone now so I guess
I don't need to worry about that scenario anymore.

So should I just add __hpux__ to the list of OS's or is the difference
between 'char *' and 'const char *' going to bite me somewhere that I
haven't seen yet?

Steve Ellcey
sje@cup.hp.com

  reply	other threads:[~2005-05-05 17:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-05-05 17:26 Steve Ellcey
2005-05-05 17:41 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-05 17:55   ` Steve Ellcey [this message]
2005-05-05 18:12     ` James E Wilson
2005-05-05 18:16       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-05 19:17         ` James E Wilson
2005-05-05 19:32       ` DJ Delorie
2005-05-05 19:47         ` James E Wilson
2005-05-05 21:40       ` Andreas Schwab
2005-05-05 21:43         ` DJ Delorie
2005-05-05 18:10 ` James E Wilson
2005-05-05 20:12 ` James E Wilson
2005-05-05 20:42   ` Steve Ellcey
2005-05-05 21:36     ` DJ Delorie
2005-05-05 21:41       ` James E Wilson
2005-05-05 22:46         ` DJ Delorie
2005-05-06  1:57           ` James E Wilson
2005-05-06  1:58             ` DJ Delorie
2005-05-09 23:28               ` Steve Ellcey
2005-05-09 23:33                 ` DJ Delorie
2005-05-12 16:37                   ` Steve Ellcey
2005-05-05 22:06   ` James E Wilson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200505051751.KAA17543@hpsje.cup.hp.com \
    --to=sje@cup.hp.com \
    --cc=binutils@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=drow@false.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).