From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6213 invoked by alias); 6 May 2005 15:50:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 5808 invoked from network); 6 May 2005 15:49:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.gentoo.org) (134.68.220.30) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 6 May 2005 15:49:53 -0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=home.wh0rd.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DU55L-0007wD-Sq for binutils@sources.redhat.com; Fri, 06 May 2005 15:49:52 +0000 Received: (qmail 17694 invoked from network); 6 May 2005 11:42:57 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 6 May 2005 11:42:57 -0400 From: Mike Frysinger To: binutils@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: support more sh targets in top level configure Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 16:04:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <200505052223.03169.vapier@gentoo.org> <20050506.134603.88489510.kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp> In-Reply-To: <20050506.134603.88489510.kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200505061151.47770.vapier@gentoo.org> X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg00276.txt.bz2 On Friday 06 May 2005 12:46 am, Kaz Kojima wrote: > The toplevel configure is shared with binutils and gcc. ah, i was not aware of this ... what else is shared between the projects at the top level ? is there a README i missed that outlines this or is it just some common knowledge :) > I don't qualify to approve it > because it includes a general SH specific change for gcc, though the > patch itself looks ok to me except sh64*-*-* matches sh*-*-* pattern > already. ok, i talked to Paul and he was going to take care of getting gcc/binutils fixed for superh, so i'll just stop stepping on his toes -mike