support more sh targets in top level configure

support more sh targets in top level configure

[Mike Frysinger]

here's a small patch by Paul Mundt ... it applies against mainline (but can be 
applied to 2.16 branch if that's allowed)

r10231 | lethal | 2005-05-02 09:58:00 -0400 (Mon, 02 May 2005) | 13 lines

Likewise, binutils has no idea about any of these new targets either, so we
fix that up too.. now we're able to actually build a real toolchain for
sh2a_nofpu- and other more ineptly named toolchains (and yes, there are more
inept targets than that one, really. Go look, I promise).

Index: configure.in
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/configure.in,v
retrieving revision 1.266
diff -u -U1 -r1.266 configure.in
--- configure.in    5 May 2005 01:36:31 -0000   1.266
+++ configure.in    6 May 2005 02:17:56 -0000
@@ -426,3 +426,3 @@
     ;;
-  sh-*-linux*)
+  sh*-*-linux*)
     noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs ${libgcj} target-newlib target-libgloss"
@@ -714,3 +714,3 @@
     ;;
-  sh-*-* | sh64-*-*)
+  sh*-*-* | sh64*-*-*)
     case "${host}" in
-mike

Re: support more sh targets in top level configure

[Kaz Kojima]

Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> diff -u -U1 -r1.266 configure.in
> --- configure.in    5 May 2005 01:36:31 -0000   1.266
> +++ configure.in    6 May 2005 02:17:56 -0000
> @@ -426,3 +426,3 @@
>      ;;
> -  sh-*-linux*)
> +  sh*-*-linux*)
>      noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs ${libgcj} target-newlib target-libgloss"
> @@ -714,3 +714,3 @@
>      ;;
> -  sh-*-* | sh64-*-*)
> +  sh*-*-* | sh64*-*-*)
>      case "${host}" in

The toplevel configure is shared with binutils and gcc.  So the patch
should be cc'ed to gcc-patches list.  I don't qualify to approve it
because it includes a general SH specific change for gcc, though the
patch itself looks ok to me except sh64*-*-* matches sh*-*-* pattern
already.  Please don't forget the appropriate ChangeLog entry when
resending it.

Regards,
	kaz

Re: support more sh targets in top level configure

[Mike Frysinger]

On Friday 06 May 2005 12:46 am, Kaz Kojima wrote:
> The toplevel configure is shared with binutils and gcc.

ah, i was not aware of this ... what else is shared between the projects at 
the top level ?  is there a README i missed that outlines this or is it just 
some common knowledge :)

>  I don't qualify to approve it
> because it includes a general SH specific change for gcc, though the
> patch itself looks ok to me except sh64*-*-* matches sh*-*-* pattern
> already.

ok, i talked to Paul and he was going to take care of getting gcc/binutils 
fixed for superh, so i'll just stop stepping on his toes
-mike

Re: support more sh targets in top level configure

[Kaz Kojima]

Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> ah, i was not aware of this ... what else is shared between the projects at 
> the top level ?  is there a README i missed that outlines this or is it just 
> some common knowledge :)

Ah, I completely forget where this knowledge came from to me :-)
I'm not sure about the complete lists, though it's shared also
between the projects in src repository of sourceware.org.
Your patch added libgcj, newlib and libgross to noconfigdirs
as default and skiped gprof on some hosts for more sh targets.
It'll affect gcc, binutils and newlib in theory.

Regards,
	kaz