Re: 2.16.1 candidate patches

[The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca>]

On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 09:58:12AM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 05:15:27PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > I've checked this in to HEAD and the 2.16 branch.  I don't know if
> > there will be a binutils 2.16.1; if no other problems turn up in the
> > next month or two, probably not.  But if there is, it will include ths
> > fix.
> 
> I'm putting http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2005-05/msg00340.html
> and http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2005-04/msg00007.html plus
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2005-04/msg00121.html on the
> branch too.  The first one is important enough to roll 2.16.1 for
> powerpc64 (or at least anyone using 2.16 and gcc-3.4 on powerpc64 will
> want the patch).  I'm an idiot because I had a problem report in early
> April but discounted it because I couldn't reproduce it, forgetting that
> my local gcc-3.4 was patched to not use dot-syms.  The other two patches
> just got forgotten but aren't critical in any way.
>

Add to that

as: unrecognized option `-Qy'

This was working under 2.15 .  What happened under 2.16?
 
> -- 
> Alan Modra
> IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre

-- 
Member - Liberal International	
This is doctor@nl2k.ab.ca	Ici doctor@nl2k.ab.ca
God Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising!
BC, Vote Liberal!!