From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25148 invoked by alias); 18 May 2005 13:36:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24566 invoked from network); 18 May 2005 13:35:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO rwcrmhc12.comcast.net) (216.148.227.85) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 18 May 2005 13:35:39 -0000 Received: from lucon.org ([24.6.212.230]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with ESMTP id <2005051813353601400kbmqge>; Wed, 18 May 2005 13:35:37 +0000 Received: by lucon.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 87C15649C0; Wed, 18 May 2005 06:35:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 13:58:00 -0000 From: "H. J. Lu" To: Jan Beulich Cc: wilson@specifixinc.com, davidm@hpl.hp.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: PATCH: Don't allow ia64 unwind section to point to section in different files Message-ID: <20050518133536.GB15599@lucon.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg00574.txt.bz2 On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 08:44:02AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > >I am checking with icc/ias people to see if we can find a common > >approach. > > I hope you have better luck than me; I tried to get their attention to various of the things that weren't really clear, and never heard anything back... > Please let me know if you find any problems like that with icc/ias. BTW, I understand gas and ias use different slots for brl relocation. I don't think it is an issue. We can deal with it later if brl is ever allowed in slot 0 in which case we will specify that the relocation must be against slot 0. H.J.