From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29621 invoked by alias); 9 Jun 2005 11:38:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29531 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Jun 2005 11:38:12 -0000 Received: from dublin.act-europe.fr (HELO dublin.act-europe.fr) (212.157.227.154) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2005 11:38:12 +0000 Received: from localhost (province.act-europe.fr [10.10.0.214]) by filtered-dublin.act-europe.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BCED229ED0; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 13:38:07 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from dublin.act-europe.fr ([10.10.0.154]) by localhost (province.act-europe.fr [10.10.0.214]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 74541-01; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 13:38:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dublin.act-europe.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0B68229ECF; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 13:38:06 +0200 (MET DST) From: Eric Botcazou To: Jonathan Larmour Subject: Re: gc sections and .eh_frame Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 11:38:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com References: <42A5DE0C.9050108@eCosCentric.com> <20050608220238.GA12206@redhat.com> <42A81B30.5030009@eCosCentric.com> In-Reply-To: <42A81B30.5030009@eCosCentric.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200506091337.13080.ebotcazou@adacore.com> X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg00210.txt.bz2 > So far, no-one has given any rationalisation for the change. It wasn't > posted to this list, so there's no reason given there. Huh... didn't you see the link I posted? Here is it again: http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2004-03/msg00424.html > To my eye, the change doesn't seem right - if a section is a dependency > of .eh_frame, it needs to be kept. Needing to forcibly KEEP() > all .gcc_except_table sections should not have been necessary in the first > place. Please read the rationale I had given for the change. -- Eric Botcazou