From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1684 invoked by alias); 15 Sep 2005 13:20:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 1661 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Sep 2005 13:20:33 -0000 Received: from omta01sl.mx.bigpond.com (HELO omta01sl.mx.bigpond.com) (144.140.92.153) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 13:20:33 +0000 Received: from grove.modra.org ([144.136.167.90]) by omta01sl.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20050915132026.TMQD5164.omta01sl.mx.bigpond.com@grove.modra.org> for ; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 13:20:26 +0000 Received: by bubble.grove.modra.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 9A81B118DEC; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 22:50:26 +0930 (CST) Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 13:39:00 -0000 From: Alan Modra To: Andrew Lunn Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Change in .ld syntax or a bug? Message-ID: <20050915132026.GR18783@bubble.grove.modra.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Lunn , binutils@sources.redhat.com References: <20050915121708.GO11369@donkey.ma.tech.ascom.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050915121708.GO11369@donkey.ma.tech.ascom.ch> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2005-09/txt/msg00176.txt.bz2 On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 02:17:08PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote: > It looks like ld is happy with sections which explicit set there > address, eg .vectors and .data, but sections which just follow on from > the previous section it is not happy with and seems to put them > outside of memory. > > Has there recently been a change in syntax? Or is this a bug? A bug, I suspect. Do you have anything in .vectors? -- Alan Modra IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre