From: "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
Cc: libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: can't build x86-32 libc on x86-64 with mainline binutils
Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 18:33:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060302183313.GB29439@lucon.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <or4q2gsou6.fsf@free.oliva.athome.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 03:06:57PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> Am I the only one having trouble assembling
> glibc/sysdeps/i386/fpu/e_atanh.S with -m32 with binutils mainline
> toplevel-bootstrapped along with GCC trunk on x86_64? I've hit this
> for several days now, maybe several weeks? (time flies)
>
> The assembler fails the sanity check for carry == 0 on
> gas/atof-generic.c:419 on line 40 of the preprocessed asm file. In
> fact, assembling that line by itself produces the same error.
>
> Here's how I configured the toolchain:
>
> ../configure amd64-linux-gnu --enable-languages=all
>
> and here's how I configured glibc:
>
> ../src/configure '--prefix=/usr' '--enable-add-ons=nptl' \
> '--without-cvs' '--with-tls' '--with-headers=/usr/include' \
> '--build=i686-pc-linux-gnu' 'CC=gcc -m32 -march=i686 -U__i686' \
> 'CXX=g++ -m32 -march=i686 -U__i686'
>
> (the ugly -U__i686 was introduced months ago; IIRC without it we'd
> fail to assemble the GOT register set up routines that have __i686 in
> their names in such a way that the preprocessor would expand __i686 to
> 1. I haven't tried without it, I've only just realized it was still
> there)
So mainline assembler doesn't work for you. Can you open a bug report
with a small testcase if you haven't done so? I will look into it.
H.J.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-02 18:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-02 18:07 Alexandre Oliva
2006-03-02 18:33 ` H. J. Lu [this message]
2006-03-02 18:44 ` Alexandre Oliva
2006-03-02 18:49 ` H. J. Lu
2006-03-02 18:56 ` Alexandre Oliva
2006-03-02 19:01 ` H. J. Lu
2006-03-03 9:56 ` Nick Clifton
2006-04-29 23:54 ` R Hill
2006-04-30 0:02 ` H. J. Lu
2006-04-30 6:53 ` Alexandre Oliva
2006-04-30 11:23 ` Gcc 4.2 miscompiles binutils on x86 and x86-64 H. J. Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060302183313.GB29439@lucon.org \
--to=hjl@lucon.org \
--cc=aoliva@redhat.com \
--cc=binutils@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).