From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-44875-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 16538 invoked by alias); 2 Mar 2006 18:49:20 -0000
Received: (qmail 16525 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Mar 2006 18:49:19 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from smtp102.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com (HELO smtp102.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (68.142.198.201)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with SMTP; Thu, 02 Mar 2006 18:49:18 +0000
Received: (qmail 46098 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2006 18:49:17 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lucon.org) (hjjean@sbcglobal.net@71.146.76.164 with login)   by smtp102.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Mar 2006 18:49:16 -0000
Received: by lucon.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) 	id 5F55263F35; Thu,  2 Mar 2006 10:49:15 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 18:49:00 -0000
From: "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
Cc: libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: can't build x86-32 libc on x86-64 with mainline binutils
Message-ID: <20060302184915.GA29626@lucon.org>
References: <or4q2gsou6.fsf@free.oliva.athome.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <20060302183313.GB29439@lucon.org> <orzmk8r8jl.fsf@free.oliva.athome.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <orzmk8r8jl.fsf@free.oliva.athome.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-03/txt/msg00024.txt.bz2

On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 03:44:14PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Mar  2, 2006, "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> wrote:
> 
> > So mainline assembler doesn't work for you. Can you open a bug report
> > with a small testcase if you haven't done so? I will look into it.
> 
> Doesn't seem to be the assembler's fault.  If I build it with GCC 4.1,
> it works just fine.
> 
> Anyhow, here's the testcase:
> 
> 	.tfloat 0.3465735902799726547086160
> 

Works for me:

[hjl@gnu-13 gas]$ cat foo.s
        .data
        .tfloat 0.3465735902799726547086160
[hjl@gnu-13 gas]$ ./as-new --version
GNU assembler 2.16.91 20060302
Copyright 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This program is free software; you may redistribute it under the terms
of
the GNU General Public License.  This program has absolutely no
warranty.
This assembler was configured for a target of
`x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu'.
[hjl@gnu-13 gas]$ ./as-new -o x.o foo.s
[hjl@gnu-13 gas]$ ./as-new -o x.o foo.s -32


H.J.