From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29497 invoked by alias); 17 Mar 2006 15:40:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 29489 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Mar 2006 15:40:25 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mh.altlinux.org (HELO mh.altlinux.org) (217.16.24.5) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 15:40:23 +0000 Received: from basalt.office.altlinux.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mh.altlinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9CF65F406 for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 18:40:20 +0300 (MSK) Received: by basalt.office.altlinux.org (Postfix, from userid 501) id 73BE9B0D8B; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 18:40:20 +0300 (MSK) Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 15:46:00 -0000 From: "Dmitry V. Levin" To: binutils@sourceware.org Subject: Re: binutils 2.17 branch Message-ID: <20060317154020.GI19838@basalt.office.altlinux.org> References: <20060317030406.GA30502@nevyn.them.org> <20060317051704.GE6777@bubble.grove.modra.org> <20060317150703.GB11242@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IR1Y5IvQhrKgS4e6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060317150703.GB11242@nevyn.them.org> X-fingerprint: FE4C 93AB E19A 2E4C CB5D 3E4E 7CAB E6AC 9E35 361E X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-03/txt/msg00248.txt.bz2 --IR1Y5IvQhrKgS4e6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 810 On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 10:07:03AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 03:47:04PM +1030, Alan Modra wrote: > > Seriously, it's still somewhat of a hack. The fact that we throw away > > syms added for an unneeded lib means I'm relying on nothing > > (eg. backend add_symbol_hook) keeping pointers into the symbol hash > > table apart from the ones I already handle (undefs, sym_hashes). >=20 > Yeah, I noticed that. I see why you did it this way, though, and I > think it will work better now than before - but I'd like it to have > a bit of testing before it goes into a release; Debian folks have > been complaining about bad --as-needed behavior since they discovered > it. I'll provide my --as-needed testing results with 5000+ packages from ALT Sisyphus in a few days. --=20 ldv --IR1Y5IvQhrKgS4e6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline Content-length: 191 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEGthkfKvmrJ41Nh4RAkaqAJwLk7ZVt+jTs93aVheTfKC9w/pV+wCeNuBx 5Op+ztfzHPFw+NPRoNfgtBA= =EYAU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IR1Y5IvQhrKgS4e6--