From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15449 invoked by alias); 31 Mar 2006 11:46:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 15440 invoked by uid 22791); 31 Mar 2006 11:46:06 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from CPE-144-136-172-108.sa.bigpond.net.au (HELO grove.modra.org) (144.136.172.108) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 11:46:06 +0000 Received: by bubble.grove.modra.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 5E79E1E0AB3; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 21:16:03 +0930 (CST) Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 12:00:00 -0000 From: Alan Modra To: Jan-Benedict Glaw Cc: Nick Clifton , binutils@sourceware.org, Sergey Ilyevsky Subject: Re: [PR 2494] PDP-11: Wrong opcode for SEC/CLC Message-ID: <20060331114603.GC22279@bubble.grove.modra.org> Mail-Followup-To: Jan-Benedict Glaw , Nick Clifton , binutils@sourceware.org, Sergey Ilyevsky References: <20060331083601.GG22210@lug-owl.de> <7bf3ae9d0603310312y3cbdaebcv85d04897415d046d@mail.gmail.com> <20060331112110.GJ22210@lug-owl.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060331112110.GJ22210@lug-owl.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-03/txt/msg00374.txt.bz2 On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 01:21:11PM +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > > > - { "sec", 0x00a1, 0xffff, PDP11_OPCODE_NO_OPS, PDP11_BASIC }, > > > + { "sec", 0x00b1, 0xffff, PDP11_OPCODE_NO_OPS, PDP11_BASIC }, > > May I check this in under the obvious rule? Yes, that would have been OK, but someone else posted a patch before this one, which I've committed. -- Alan Modra IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre