From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27135 invoked by alias); 29 Apr 2006 14:51:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 27127 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Apr 2006 14:51:00 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp107.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com (HELO smtp107.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (68.142.198.206) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with SMTP; Sat, 29 Apr 2006 14:50:58 +0000 Received: (qmail 38786 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2006 14:50:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lucon.org) (hjjean@sbcglobal.net@75.0.171.244 with login) by smtp107.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 29 Apr 2006 14:50:56 -0000 Received: by lucon.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E200B64034; Sat, 29 Apr 2006 07:50:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 00:02:00 -0000 From: "H. J. Lu" To: R Hill Cc: Nick Clifton , aoliva@redhat.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: can't build x86-32 libc on x86-64 with mainline binutils Message-ID: <20060429145053.GA3225@lucon.org> References: <20060302183313.GB29439@lucon.org> <44081538.7070304@redhat.com> <4453042B.3040005@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4453042B.3040005@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-04/txt/msg00430.txt.bz2 On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 12:14:03AM -0600, R Hill wrote: > > Testcase is: > > .tfloat 1.442695040888963407359924681002 > > Binutils is 2.16.92, configured with: > It works for me with binutils in CVS and the Linux binutils 2.16.91.0.7. Does the Linux binutils 2.16.91.0.7 work for you? H.J.