From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-45696-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 10215 invoked by alias); 2 May 2006 04:07:52 -0000
Received: (qmail 10205 invoked by uid 22791); 2 May 2006 04:07:50 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from CPE-144-136-172-108.sa.bigpond.net.au (HELO grove.modra.org) (144.136.172.108)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 May 2006 04:07:49 +0000
Received: by bubble.grove.modra.org (Postfix, from userid 500) 	id 0B2FA1E22AA; Tue,  2 May 2006 13:37:45 +0930 (CST)
Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 04:07:00 -0000
From: Alan Modra <amodra@bigpond.net.au>
To: Ben Elliston <bje@au1.ibm.com>
Cc: binutils@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: PATCH: use unsigned int :1 bitfield
Message-ID: <20060502040745.GH11597@bubble.grove.modra.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Ben Elliston <bje@au1.ibm.com>, 	binutils@sourceware.org
References: <20060502034447.GA2645@ozlabs.au.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20060502034447.GA2645@ozlabs.au.ibm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-05/txt/msg00022.txt.bz2

On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 01:44:47PM +1000, Ben Elliston wrote:
> Another patch hanging around in my checkout.  It's best to qualify one
> bit wide bitfields as unsigned.  I believe the C standard leaves the
> exact range of values for a signed :1 field up to the
> implementation--am I right?

Yes, according to my copy.

> 	* config/obj-elf.h (ELF_TARGET_SYMBOL_FIELDS): Make single bit
> 	field unsigned.

OK.

-- 
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre