From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8640 invoked by alias); 11 May 2006 03:11:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 8630 invoked by uid 22791); 11 May 2006 03:11:54 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from CPE-144-136-172-108.sa.bigpond.net.au (HELO grove.modra.org) (144.136.172.108) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 May 2006 03:11:52 +0000 Received: by bubble.grove.modra.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id D07CB1E127A; Thu, 11 May 2006 12:41:48 +0930 (CST) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 08:56:00 -0000 From: Alan Modra To: "H. J. Lu" Cc: binutils@sourceware.org Subject: Re: pr2342 Message-ID: <20060511031148.GH24458@bubble.grove.modra.org> Mail-Followup-To: "H. J. Lu" , binutils@sourceware.org References: <20060510044552.GC22090@bubble.grove.modra.org> <20060510151354.GA12352@lucon.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060510151354.GA12352@lucon.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-05/txt/msg00210.txt.bz2 On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 08:13:54AM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote: > http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2006-04/msg00329.html Please install the fix for match_group_member to mainline and 2.17 branch. The rest of the patch needs some thought. I'd like to avoid the need for another elf_section_data field. Can't you simply store the group member in asection kept_section? In fact, why are we pointing kept_section of a group member to the kept group section rather than a kept group member? Won't that break emit_relocs code in elf_link_input_bfd? -- Alan Modra IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre