From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16881 invoked by alias); 12 May 2006 17:05:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 16866 invoked by uid 22791); 12 May 2006 17:05:49 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp106.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com (HELO smtp106.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (68.142.198.205) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with SMTP; Fri, 12 May 2006 17:05:15 +0000 Received: (qmail 36377 invoked from network); 12 May 2006 17:05:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lucon.org) (hjjean@sbcglobal.net@71.146.87.95 with login) by smtp106.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 12 May 2006 17:05:13 -0000 Received: by lucon.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 08C8E641A3; Fri, 12 May 2006 10:05:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 01:07:00 -0000 From: "H. J. Lu" To: binutils@sources.redhat.com Cc: richard@codesourcery.com Subject: Incorrect assumption on the CIE/FDE alignment Message-ID: <20060512170511.GA30942@lucon.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-05/txt/msg00240.txt.bz2 Hi Richard, Your patch: http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2004-11/msg00226.html assumes that CIE/FDE are aligned at the pointer size. But it isn't necessarily true. See http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2657 Do you have any suggestions? Thanks. H.J.