From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-46020-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 29122 invoked by alias); 19 May 2006 18:09:47 -0000
Received: (qmail 29111 invoked by uid 22791); 19 May 2006 18:09:47 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from bender.bawue.de (HELO bender.bawue.de) (193.7.176.20)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 May 2006 18:09:45 +0000
Received: from lagash (unknown [194.74.144.146]) 	by bender.bawue.de (Postfix) with ESMTP 	id 5203D45476; Fri, 19 May 2006 20:09:43 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from ths by lagash with local (Exim 4.62) 	(envelope-from <ths@networkno.de>) 	id 1Fh9PP-0005rh-Sd; Fri, 19 May 2006 19:09:07 +0100
Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 21:22:00 -0000
To: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
Cc: binutils@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Test suite results for mipsel-unknown-linux-gnu (2.16.93)
Message-ID: <20060519180907.GB9968@networkno.de>
References: <20060519172443.GA14717@deprecation.cyrius.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20060519172443.GA14717@deprecation.cyrius.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403
From: Thiemo Seufer <ths@networkno.de>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-05/txt/msg00346.txt.bz2

Martin Michlmayr wrote:
[snip]
> 		=== ld tests ===
> 
> Schedule of variations:
>     unix
> 
> FAIL: vers24a
> FAIL: vers24b
> FAIL: vers24c
> FAIL: visibility (hidden_undef) (non PIC, load offset)
> FAIL: visibility (hidden_weak) (non PIC)
> FAIL: visibility (hidden_weak)
> FAIL: visibility (hidden_weak) (PIC main, non PIC so)
> FAIL: visibility (hidden_weak) (PIC main)
> FAIL: visibility (protected_undef) (non PIC, load offset)
> FAIL: visibility (protected_weak) (non PIC)
> FAIL: visibility (protected_weak)
> FAIL: visibility (protected_weak) (PIC main, non PIC so)
> FAIL: visibility (protected_weak) (PIC main)
> FAIL: MIPS textrel-1
> FAIL: NOCROSSREFS 3

The SIGILL-induced of those are apparently neither hardware nor
endianness dependent, I got the same pattern on two different
machine architectures with different endianness.


Thiemo