From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7733 invoked by alias); 25 May 2006 13:27:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 7725 invoked by uid 22791); 25 May 2006 13:27:47 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 May 2006 13:27:45 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1FjFsL-00084U-Td; Thu, 25 May 2006 09:27:41 -0400 Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 15:39:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Ben Elliston Cc: Nathan Sidwell , binutils@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Correct m68k float flag logic Message-ID: <20060525132741.GA31002@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ben Elliston , Nathan Sidwell , binutils@sourceware.org References: <20060523065246.GA23343@ozlabs.au.ibm.com> <20060525155535.B16253@mailhub.air.net.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060525155535.B16253@mailhub.air.net.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-05/txt/msg00459.txt.bz2 On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 03:55:35PM +1000, Ben Elliston wrote: > > I've installed this patch (as obvious), for a problem with the m68k's float > > format logic. The -mfloat flag is used for both m68k and cf floats, which > > to target is determined by the target cpu. That check should be done > > _before_ testing whether we've been given flags for both m68k & cf > > architectures. > > > > We've been using this on the binutils-csl-2_17-branch for some time (and > > we're just going through making sure things get back to mainline). > > > > Ben, do you want this on the binutils-2_17-branch too? > > It's okay with me if it's okay with the release manager. :-) Go ahead. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery