From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17490 invoked by alias); 12 Jun 2006 18:49:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 12414 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Jun 2006 18:35:08 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 18:34:03 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k5CIY1cN018044; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 14:34:01 -0400 Received: from post-office.corp.redhat.com (post-office.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.227]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k5CIXuhP016138; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 14:33:56 -0400 Received: from greed.delorie.com (dj.cipe.redhat.com [10.0.0.222]) by post-office.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k5CIXsR26406; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 14:33:55 -0400 Received: from greed.delorie.com (greed.delorie.com [127.0.0.1]) by greed.delorie.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k5CIXsRP016838; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 14:33:54 -0400 Received: (from dj@localhost) by greed.delorie.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id k5CIXmfE016835; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 14:33:48 -0400 Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 18:53:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200606121833.k5CIXmfE016835@greed.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: schwab@suse.de CC: binutils@sourceware.org In-reply-to: (message from Andreas Schwab on Mon, 12 Jun 2006 11:19:24 +0200) Subject: Re: Increment References: <20060606030414.GH519@bubble.grove.modra.org> <20060612002124.GF32562@bubble.grove.modra.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-06/txt/msg00192.txt.bz2 > Are you sure that the hash resizing was actually triggered in your tests? I tested it with a 1Gb+ executable, and the change made a significant improvement, and the resize was definitely happening.