On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 10:23:21 -0700
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> wrote:

> Alan Modra wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 08:00:03PM +0200, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
> >> Attached is a little patch that adds '-z nonow' as the opposite of
> >> '-z now'.  Could it be considered for inclusion, please?
> > 
> > You need to provide a proper changelog entry, and describe the
> > option in [...]
> 
> You cannot honestly consider allowing a patch introducing -z nonow.
> What is the opposite to 'now' in ELF terms?  It's not 'nonow', it's
> 'lazy'.

Ok; attached is an updated patch, hopefully I've addressed issues as
required so far.  Anything more, please say.

Thanks,
-- 
Kevin F. Quinn