Re: changes in 'intl'

[Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>]

On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 03:33:12PM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 11:33:02AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > Index: binutils/ChangeLog
> > 2006-05-31  Daniel Jacobowitz  <dan@codesourcery.com>
> > 
> > 	* Makefile.am: Replace INTLLIBS with LIBINTL everywhere.  Add
> > 	DEPENDENCIES variables for every program.
> 
> This results in libbfd, libopcodes, and libiberty dependencies being
> omitted.  If you specify *_DEPENDENCIES variables, they need to list
> *all* dependencies.  A similar problem occurs if you try to add empty
> rules for the exe files like
> addr2line$(EXEEXT): $(LIBINTL_DEP)
> ar$(EXEEXT): $(LIBINTL_DEP)
> ..
> Automake then decides not to add its own rules.  :-(
> 
> This patch isn't very nice, but I'm not inclined to delve into automake
> to find a more elegant solution.

Oh, that's where this patch went - sorry, it got dropped into my rda@
folder.

Aside from the @LEXLIB@ problem which I fixed the next day, this is
about the best we can do.  There's no user hook to perform the LDADD ->
DEPENDENCIES conversion, unfortunately.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery