On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 12:33:27PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Well, don't look at the histograms for .gnu.hash in that data either, just
> for .hash.  I just realized I used readelf -I from binutils build with the
> latest DT_GNU_HASH patch (i.e. the new, smaller .gnu.hash format) on the
> binaries/libraries created by older binutils (the older, bigger .gnu.hash
> format).  I was shocked to see e.g. chains with length 48 in there only
> to figure later that they aren't that long.  If you are interested, will
> repost new ppc.after.bz2 and ia64.after.bz2 data, created with the matching
> readelf.  Sorry.

Attached are corrected ppc.after2.bz2 and ia64.after2.bz2 which use the
matching readelf, so .gnu.hash histograms are correct.

	Jakub