public inbox for binutils@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Mikhail Teterin <mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com>
Cc: Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@lug-owl.de>, binutils@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: backward/forward compatibility of binutils
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2006 15:11:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060707151113.GA24374@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200607071044.22680@aldan>

On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 10:44:22AM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> On Friday 07 July 2006 09:27, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> = Of course. I didn't mention that it would be a nice thing to have. I'm
> = actually opposed to it.
> 
> Why not? How hard is it to keep API compatibility (no need for ABI)?

It is an effort, and has roughly no benefit.  BFD is an integral part
of the tools that use it, not a clearly separated component.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

  reply	other threads:[~2006-07-07 15:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-07-07  6:50 Mikhail Teterin
2006-07-07 12:51 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2006-07-07 13:22   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-07-07 13:28     ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2006-07-07 14:44       ` Mikhail Teterin
2006-07-07 15:11         ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2006-07-07 15:32           ` Mikhail Teterin
2006-07-07 17:27             ` Ian Lance Taylor
2006-07-07 15:40         ` Dave Korn
2006-07-07 16:18           ` Mikhail Teterin
2006-07-07 16:30             ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2006-07-07 16:39               ` Dave Korn
2006-07-07 18:42               ` Mikhail Teterin
2006-07-07 18:45                 ` 'Daniel Jacobowitz'
2006-07-07 18:56                   ` Mikhail Teterin
2006-07-07 18:58                     ` 'Daniel Jacobowitz'
2006-07-07 19:02                 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2006-07-07 19:46                   ` Mikhail Teterin
2006-07-07 20:29                     ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2006-07-07 20:33                     ` Ian Lance Taylor
2006-07-07 20:33                     ` Christopher Faylor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060707151113.GA24374@nevyn.them.org \
    --to=drow@false.org \
    --cc=binutils@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=jbglaw@lug-owl.de \
    --cc=mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).