From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-46796-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 27255 invoked by alias); 12 Jul 2006 16:17:05 -0000
Received: (qmail 27242 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Jul 2006 16:17:04 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from ns2.uludag.org.tr (HELO uludag.org.tr) (193.140.100.220)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Jul 2006 16:17:01 +0000
Received: from southpark.local (unknown [85.97.18.43]) 	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) 	(No client certificate requested) 	by uludag.org.tr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A30C8BB8C6 	for <binutils@sourceware.org>; Wed, 12 Jul 2006 19:16:53 +0300 (EEST)
From: =?utf-8?q?=C4=B0smail_D=C3=B6nmez?= <ismail@pardus.org.tr>
To: binutils@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: linker error with new linker
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 16:17:00 -0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3
References: <44B42F5C.37FF.0081.0@novell.com> <howtaij0up.fsf@reger.suse.de>
In-Reply-To: <howtaij0up.fsf@reger.suse.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;   charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200607121916.59114.ismail@pardus.org.tr>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-07/txt/msg00157.txt.bz2

=C3=87ar=C5=9Famba 12 Temmuz 2006 18:31 tarihinde, Andreas Jaeger =C5=9Funl=
ar=C4=B1 yazm=C4=B1=C5=9Ft=C4=B1:=20
> "John Calcote" <jcalcote@novell.com> writes:
> > [...]
> > If this assumption is correct, then I believe it's really a good thing
> > - we SHOULD use all -fPIC flagged code in shared libraries. But I'm not
> > sure why it's become important in this later version of the linker.
> >
> > SuSE Linux 10 box - ld is 2.16.91.0.2 20050720 (packaged with gcc
> > 4.0.2): works fine.
> > [...]
>
> It was always this way on x86-64 - and ia64, s390, ppc.  Just i386
> handles shared libs without -fPIC - and even there it's not
> recommended.

I always thought this was a gcc bug but I guess its not and its the intende=
d=20
behaviour ?

Regards,
ismail

--=20
=E6=97=A5=E6=9C=AC=E3=81=AEanime=E3=81=AF=E6=8F=BA=E3=82=8C=E3=82=8B=20