From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23189 invoked by alias); 28 Jul 2006 07:32:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 23181 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Jul 2006 07:32:58 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from ausmtp04.au.ibm.com (HELO ausmtp04.au.ibm.com) (202.81.18.152) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 07:32:55 +0000 Received: from sd0208e0.au.ibm.com (d23rh904.au.ibm.com [202.81.18.202]) by ausmtp04.au.ibm.com (8.13.6/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k6S7cAnf254142 for ; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 17:38:10 +1000 Received: from d23av01.au.ibm.com (d23av01.au.ibm.com [9.190.250.242]) by sd0208e0.au.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VER6.8) with ESMTP id k6S7ZXnM150598 for ; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 17:35:34 +1000 Received: from d23av01.au.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d23av01.au.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k6S7W9aA027290 for ; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 17:32:10 +1000 Received: from ozlabs.au.ibm.com (ozlabs.au.ibm.com [9.190.163.12]) by d23av01.au.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k6S7W9T5027287; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 17:32:09 +1000 Received: by ozlabs.au.ibm.com (Postfix, from userid 1017) id F1B017374D; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 17:33:31 +1000 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 07:32:00 -0000 From: Ben Elliston To: Ashutosh Yeole Cc: binutils@sourceware.org Subject: Re: NOLOAD problem with binutils 2.16.92 Message-ID: <20060728073331.GB22431@ozlabs.au.ibm.com> References: <4A1BE23A7B777442B60F4B4916AE0F130D0EF070@sohm.kpit.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A1BE23A7B777442B60F4B4916AE0F130D0EF070@sohm.kpit.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-07/txt/msg00352.txt.bz2 > I had posted a problem related to binutils 2.16.92 > > Please refer to the following link for the posted problem, > http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2006-07/msg00225.html > After further investigation, I found that this problem also exists for > ARM and m32r targets also. Before we go much further, have you tested with CVS binutils? Cheers, Ben