From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25148 invoked by alias); 22 Mar 2007 14:17:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 25138 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Mar 2007 14:17:18 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from return.false.org (HELO return.false.org) (66.207.162.98) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Mar 2007 14:17:10 +0000 Received: from return.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FFC24B267; Thu, 22 Mar 2007 09:17:09 -0500 (CDT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (dsl093-172-095.pit1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.172.95]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32FE94B262; Thu, 22 Mar 2007 09:17:04 -0500 (CDT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HUO6C-0000iJ-4S; Thu, 22 Mar 2007 10:17:04 -0400 Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 14:17:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Andrew STUBBS , binutils@sourceware.org Cc: dberlin@dberlin.org Subject: Re: SVN for src (was Re: Binutils 2.18 prep) Message-ID: <20070322141704.GA2725@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew STUBBS , binutils@sourceware.org, dberlin@dberlin.org References: <20070322024838.GA4722@caradoc.them.org> <46025531.90105@st.com> <20070322141122.GD9274@cox.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070322141122.GD9274@cox.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14+cvs20070313 (2007-03-13) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-03/txt/msg00293.txt.bz2 On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 10:11:22AM -0400, Bob Rossi wrote: > On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 10:06:41AM +0000, Andrew STUBBS wrote: > > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > >I expect to create the branch within a couple of weeks. I'd like to > > >keep the branch-to-release interval fairly short; I've been using > > >better revision control systems than CVS lately, and they've left me > > >very bitter about having to merge patches to a CVS branch. Volunteers > > >to find a workable way to use SVN for src instead are highly welcomed > > >as far as I'm concerned. > > > > My understanding is that the problem is the lack of Subversion support > > for something like CVS modules. > > It seems to me like a high profile project like this might be able to > get the subversion guys to add a feature or two in order to make svn > more usable in large, real world projects? I think the feature we need is even on the drawing board already for an unspecified future release - an equivalent to svk's "views". Dan, am I just making that up? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery