From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-50131-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 22999 invoked by alias); 10 Apr 2007 17:18:44 -0000
Received: (qmail 22989 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Apr 2007 17:18:44 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from smtp103.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com (HELO smtp103.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com) (68.142.229.102)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with SMTP; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 18:18:32 +0100
Received: (qmail 54531 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2007 17:18:30 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lucon.org) (hjjean@sbcglobal.net@75.61.85.239 with login)   by smtp103.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Apr 2007 17:18:29 -0000
X-YMail-OSG: NAWkeAAVM1kJ9zrYTrYrGLZeOvnYR_JRMKi122H2L5kpNruP95Zi_5r_GSY0BSGW.h_lWNofRE1f0s0UI1nWZmTgd6jdMlr8gEL6qfO5Sz2NKd550bf9aTntK21wEg--
Received: by lucon.org (Postfix, from userid 500) 	id D485146EEEB; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 10:18:28 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 17:18:00 -0000
From: "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
To: Kai Tietz <Kai.Tietz@onevision.com>
Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: PATCH: w64 native support
Message-ID: <20070410171828.GA22148@lucon.org>
References: <20070410161245.GA21801@lucon.org> <OF4DFB67EA.BC42AAB9-ONC12572B9.005D155B-C12572B9.005D6813@onevision.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <OF4DFB67EA.BC42AAB9-ONC12572B9.005D155B-C12572B9.005D6813@onevision.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <binutils.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-04/txt/msg00081.txt.bz2

On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 07:00:14PM +0200, Kai Tietz wrote:
> "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> wrote on 10.04.2007 18:12:45:
> 
> > Have you looked at
> > 
> > http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2737
> > 
> > Does windres work for x64?
> 
> 
> I replaced in all structures of windres.h the type "unsigned long" by 
> "unsigned int" for test and patched the dependent files to use not long 
> type-specifier in printf methods. It works that way, but I am not certain, 
> if this would break an other target, where "int" isn't 4 bytes long ? 
			       ^^^^^
			       It should be host, not target.

It is better than what we have today. You can add

	assert (sizeof (int) == 4);

somewhere.


H.J.