From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21201 invoked by alias); 13 Aug 2007 00:33:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 21189 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Aug 2007 00:33:42 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:33:40 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE1F798308 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:33:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80F7A98299 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:33:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IKNsG-0006H5-Pa for binutils@sourceware.org; Sun, 12 Aug 2007 20:33:36 -0400 Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:33:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: binutils@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Binutils 2.18 prep Message-ID: <20070813003336.GA23203@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: binutils@sourceware.org References: <20070322024838.GA4722@caradoc.them.org> <20070730165146.GA17514@caradoc.them.org> <20070806211252.GA21151@caradoc.them.org> <46BAFE4D.6050302@ubuntu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46BAFE4D.6050302@ubuntu.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-08/txt/msg00182.txt.bz2 On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 01:45:17PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > I see patches sent to the ML labeled as bug fixes, but they are not applied to > the branch. Could these bug fixes be applied to the branch as well? > > http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-08/msg00115.html SSE4 fixes in Intel mode. I don't think this is especially important for the branch, but it isn't harmful either, so I merged it. > http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-08/msg00116.html This thread appears to be a dud. > http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-08/msg00120.html Alan has already applied this to the branch. > http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-08/msg00121.html Ditto. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery