From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3314 invoked by alias); 14 Aug 2007 13:31:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 3227 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Aug 2007 13:31:37 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (HELO smtp.gentoo.org) (140.211.166.183) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Aug 2007 13:31:32 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE463655E6; Tue, 14 Aug 2007 13:31:29 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger To: Jakub Jelinek Subject: Re: GNU hash-style compatibility problem on x86_64 Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 13:31:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 Cc: binutils@sourceware.org, "H.J. Lu" , Greg Schafer References: <20070814072231.GA1370@eyo32.local> <200708140907.30639.vapier@gentoo.org> <20070814132926.GR4603@sunsite.mff.cuni.cz> In-Reply-To: <20070814132926.GR4603@sunsite.mff.cuni.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2467551.yUjRhkcA2t"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200708140931.49734.vapier@gentoo.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-08/txt/msg00205.txt.bz2 --nextPart2467551.yUjRhkcA2t Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Content-length: 1295 On Tuesday 14 August 2007, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 09:07:29AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Tuesday 14 August 2007, H.J. Lu wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 08:56:38AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 05:47:47AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote: > > > > > Well, it sounds like a bug in binutils 2.17. There are so many of > > > > > them and they have been fixed in the current binutils. I don't wa= nt > > > > > to spend time on it unless it is reproducible in the current > > > > > binutils. > > > > > > > > But wasn't the point of --hash-style=3Dboth to be compatible with o= lder > > > > tools? > > > > > > I don't recommend older tools on Linux. If it forces users to use > > > the current binutils on Linux, it is even better. > > > > except that binutils-2.17 is "current binutils" ... not everyone > > recognizes the snapshots as real releases (since they arent real GNU > > releases) > > Well, if you build your glibc with newer binutils than that > (otherwise it wouldn't be built with --hash-style=3Dboth), then you alrea= dy > weren't recognizing 2.17 as "current binutils". or you were simply testing the latest snapshot and didnt realize you just=20 boned yourself with an option that's supposed to be backwards compatible -mike --nextPart2467551.yUjRhkcA2t Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-length: 827 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.5 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUARsGuxUFjO5/oN/WBAQKwWA//Zw5vw30ZhNtchfSWgYhElMqZl/K+L0qH 2ZwbMQ3WAqL8AYNeOBRO54ypwFRSCgVJld2DKr3DmPxF4O6tMu1T7ye2pYmJ0fIa Vp430vprXm8Fl1O8+JfKb5Z7BQhVJYC3yzPcZmPF5shfQUNtzlf1k+7WZXRi1sFk CfUSIdqdx0216IOVN0RFwf9srlOCvVX8AT1GOXZpXRkrGnDg1Vq9Uv4p+wDgEd+j xHgWNzzk2ERLebfHRypdzf9oznGryRIY6IyO20dEGxGVwmlLW81zOvC8bKCwsUbD FaBvfBx6PbGesEYUNTDK7xyawiAXm7qkEq9FleBFyyUWBMsXJAkcCt6RkF95plrM K23lksA2MIAjTFnKDgHHMnzJlYdUIQRitrnW5sWUmeKyDzaRjhLksIrtDfXJ8E3Y nB8fVUDGeYLg6G9hV1qJ2odES2MmNqQqXBYmPgWZ5fNyImGJLNplXyMbF/hl4bye LyeX30Hsxiz0uvcek2/HuBVOlZCKZ3OxBFMO+YyNGLb/IwbUq40VXY+s1e8S7IZB 8sBuOzoseynGFBQP0iWNCrywD4Io/TE7MCIISyDkzhMYquPmktlwLzY/ZIELXNE1 neevI2biN/tuyg8EFk4nx7rh/xjCjOCGVOQ0dElJLWxL5+ooZHHNBXgKzhCPUA9j lxLNXB+IYlk= =U4sX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2467551.yUjRhkcA2t--