From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18911 invoked by alias); 14 Aug 2007 13:02:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 18708 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Aug 2007 13:02:14 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rwcrmhc15.comcast.net (HELO rwcrmhc15.comcast.net) (204.127.192.85) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Aug 2007 13:02:06 +0000 Received: from lucon.org ([24.6.230.138]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc15) with ESMTP id <20070814130154m1500t98h1e>; Tue, 14 Aug 2007 13:02:05 +0000 Received: by lucon.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 90131F8243; Tue, 14 Aug 2007 06:01:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 13:02:00 -0000 From: "H.J. Lu" To: Greg Schafer , binutils@sourceware.org Subject: Re: GNU hash-style compatibility problem on x86_64 Message-ID: <20070814130154.GA22485@lucon.org> References: <20070814072231.GA1370@eyo32.local> <20070814124747.GA22418@lucon.org> <20070814125638.GA11842@caradoc.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070814125638.GA11842@caradoc.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12) Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-08/txt/msg00202.txt.bz2 On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 08:56:38AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 05:47:47AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote: > > Well, it sounds like a bug in binutils 2.17. There are so many of them > > and they have been fixed in the current binutils. I don't want to spend > > time on it unless it is reproducible in the current binutils. > > But wasn't the point of --hash-style=both to be compatible with older > tools? > I don't recommend older tools on Linux. If it forces users to use the current binutils on Linux, it is even better. H.J.