From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Cc: binutils@sourceware.org, "H.J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>,
Greg Schafer <gschafer@zip.com.au>
Subject: Re: GNU hash-style compatibility problem on x86_64
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 13:23:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070814132926.GR4603@sunsite.mff.cuni.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200708140907.30639.vapier@gentoo.org>
On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 09:07:29AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 August 2007, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 08:56:38AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 05:47:47AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > > > Well, it sounds like a bug in binutils 2.17. There are so many of them
> > > > and they have been fixed in the current binutils. I don't want to spend
> > > > time on it unless it is reproducible in the current binutils.
> > >
> > > But wasn't the point of --hash-style=both to be compatible with older
> > > tools?
> >
> > I don't recommend older tools on Linux. If it forces users to use
> > the current binutils on Linux, it is even better.
>
> except that binutils-2.17 is "current binutils" ... not everyone recognizes
> the snapshots as real releases (since they arent real GNU releases)
Well, if you build your glibc with newer binutils than that
(otherwise it wouldn't be built with --hash-style=both), then you already
weren't recognizing 2.17 as "current binutils".
Jakub
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-14 13:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-14 7:22 Greg Schafer
2007-08-14 12:48 ` H.J. Lu
2007-08-14 12:56 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-08-14 13:02 ` H.J. Lu
2007-08-14 13:07 ` Mike Frysinger
2007-08-14 13:23 ` Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2007-08-14 13:31 ` Mike Frysinger
2007-08-14 13:39 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-08-14 22:45 ` Greg Schafer
2007-08-14 23:35 ` DJ Delorie
2007-08-15 0:58 ` Greg Schafer
2007-08-15 1:01 ` DJ Delorie
2007-08-25 0:05 ` Eric Botcazou
2007-08-29 17:12 ` Mike Frysinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070814132926.GR4603@sunsite.mff.cuni.cz \
--to=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
--cc=gschafer@zip.com.au \
--cc=hjl@lucon.org \
--cc=vapier@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).