From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15992 invoked by alias); 14 Aug 2007 13:39:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 15906 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Aug 2007 13:39:45 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Aug 2007 13:39:39 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E799E98308 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2007 13:39:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE50C98100 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2007 13:39:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IKwcS-0003dq-EK for binutils@sourceware.org; Tue, 14 Aug 2007 09:39:36 -0400 Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 13:39:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: binutils@sourceware.org Subject: Re: GNU hash-style compatibility problem on x86_64 Message-ID: <20070814133936.GA13976@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: binutils@sourceware.org References: <20070814072231.GA1370@eyo32.local> <20070814125638.GA11842@caradoc.them.org> <20070814130154.GA22485@lucon.org> <200708140907.30639.vapier@gentoo.org> <20070814132926.GR4603@sunsite.mff.cuni.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070814132926.GR4603@sunsite.mff.cuni.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-08/txt/msg00206.txt.bz2 On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 03:29:26PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Well, if you build your glibc with newer binutils than that > (otherwise it wouldn't be built with --hash-style=both), then you already > weren't recognizing 2.17 as "current binutils". Your distributor probably did it for you. Or the distributor of some third party library, not necessarily glibc. If there's something we can fix that would make --hash-style=both libraries work with older binutils on x86-64, we should fix it. I don't know if it's possible, though. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery