* PATCH: Continue if processor doesn't match
@ 2008-01-11 16:12 H.J. Lu
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: H.J. Lu @ 2008-01-11 16:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: binutils
There is no need to match operands if processor doesn't match. I
am checking in this patch to implement it.
H.J.
---
2008-01-10 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
* config/tc-i386.c (match_template): Continue if processor
doesn't match.
--- gas/config/tc-i386.c.skip 2008-01-10 10:16:03.000000000 -0800
+++ gas/config/tc-i386.c 2008-01-10 12:46:49.000000000 -0800
@@ -3056,13 +3056,11 @@ match_template (void)
else
{
found_cpu_match = cpu_flags_match (t->cpu_flags) == 3;
+ if (!found_cpu_match)
+ continue;
if (!t->operands)
- {
- if (!found_cpu_match)
- continue;
- /* We've found a match; break out of loop. */
- break;
- }
+ /* We've found a match; break out of loop. */
+ break;
}
/* Address size prefix will turn Disp64/Disp32/Disp16 operand
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2008-01-10 20:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-01-11 16:12 PATCH: Continue if processor doesn't match H.J. Lu
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).