public inbox for binutils@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] New --pe-dll-characteristcs switch for PE ld.
@ 2009-03-05 12:49 Dave Korn
  2009-03-06  5:47 ` Christopher Faylor
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 36+ messages in thread
From: Dave Korn @ 2009-03-05 12:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: binutils

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5557 bytes --]


    Hi team,

  The PE header in executables contains a field called "DllCharacteristics",
which contains various flags that inform the OS dynamic loader about the
status of the executable w.r.t. runtime factors such as NX/DEP, ASLR, dynamic
rebasing, etc.  (Despite the name, it applies to executables of all kinds, not
just DLLs, but that's what MS calls it so that's what I call it).

  Until now, BFD and LD have done nothing with this field, and it is zero in
all binutils-generated PE executables to date.  However the Cygwin project now
has a need to use these flags to ensure compatibility of our applications on
post-Vista versions of Windows; we've had a number of reports lately of
crashes that can be resolved by applying various of the flags in this bitfield.

  The attached patch adds a new linker option to allow setting the value of
this field.  As the default for this field is zero, and as there is no other
source for these flags in any of the input BFDs, I haven't provided a
mechanism to clear any of these flags; that would make a suitable follow-on
patch for objcopy, but first things first.

  You'll notice I've changed the type of the DllCharacteristics field from
short to unsigned short.  This fixes a minor bug that was causing the output
routines in bfd/peXXigen.c#_bfd_XX_print_private_bfd_data_common() (and hence
objdump) to display the tsaware flag as '0xffff8000' owing to sign extension.
 There shouldn't be any significant back-compat problems with this but it
would cause a change in output if using objdump to examine an executable that
was compiled with native tools that had set that flag.  I think it's worth the
minor pain; apologies in advance to anyone who has to fix a test script.  (Not
that we have any in our sources, but somone somewhere might just).

  Tested on {i686-pc-cygwin, i686-pc-linux-gnu} x {arm-epoc-pe, arm-wince-pe,
i386-pc-netbsdpe, i386-pc-pe, i586-pc-interix, i586-unknown-beospe,
i686-pc-cygwin, i686-pc-mingw32, mcore-unknown-pe, powerpcle-unknown-pe,
sh-unknown-pe, thumb-epoc-pe, x86_64-pc-freebsd, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu,
x86_64-pc-mingw32}, no regressions and all new tests pass on all PE platforms
tested.  Docs, NEWS and testcases included.  Ok for HEAD?

include/ChangeLog

	* coff/internal.h (struct internal_extra_pe_aouthdr):  Correct type
	of DllCharacteristics flags field to unsigned.
	* coff/pe.h (IMAGE_DLL_CHARACTERISTICS_DYNAMIC_BASE,
	IMAGE_DLL_CHARACTERISTICS_DYNAMIC_BASE,	
	IMAGE_DLL_CHARACTERISTICS_NX_COMPAT,
	IMAGE_DLLCHARACTERISTICS_NO_ISOLATION,
	IMAGE_DLLCHARACTERISTICS_NO_SEH,
	IMAGE_DLLCHARACTERISTICS_NO_BIND,
	IMAGE_DLLCHARACTERISTICS_WDM_DRIVER,
	IMAGE_DLLCHARACTERISTICS_TERMINAL_SERVER_AWARE):  New macros define
	flag bit values for DllCharacteristics field of PEAOUTHDR, PEPAOUTHDR.
	
ld/ChangeLog

	* NEWS:  Mention new '--pe-dll-characteristics' option.
	* ld/ld.texinfo:  Document new '--pe-dll-characteristics' option.
	* emultempl/pe.em (OPTION_PE_DLL_CHARACTERISTICS):  New getopts flag.
	(gld${EMULATION_NAME}_add_options):  Add --pe-dll-characteristics
	to array of switches.
	(definfoflag):  Add new struct definition.
	(C, CF):  Add new helper macros.
	(dllchrctnames[]):  Add new array of DllCharacteristics flag names.
	(definfo):  Add new flagnames member pointing to definfoflag array.
	(D):  Adjust macro to zero-init new flagnames field.
	(DF):  Add new macro like D but allows setting flagnames.
	(init[]):  Add zero-initialised flagnames members where needed, and
	new entry for new __dll_characteristics__ PE value.
	(gld_${EMULATION_NAME}_list_options):  Document new option.
	(find_pe_flag_name):  New helper to search definfoflag arrays.
	(find_pe_name):  New helper broken out from set_pe_name.
	(set_pe_name):  Use it.
	(is_flag_sep):  New helper function to test separator characters.
	(set_pe_value_from_flags):  New function parses mixed flagnames and
	integers format to set a PE value.
	(gld${EMULATION_NAME}_handle_option):  Call it to handle new
	OPTION_PE_DLL_CHARACTERISTICS option.
	* emultempl/pep.em (enum options):  Add OPTION_PE_DLL_CHARACTERISTICS.
	(gld${EMULATION_NAME}_add_options):  Add --pe-dll-characteristics
	to array of switches.
	(definfoflag):  Add new struct definition.
	(C, CF):  Add new helper macros.
	(dllchrctnames[]):  Add new array of DllCharacteristics flag names.
	(definfo):  Add new flagnames member pointing to definfoflag array.
	(D):  Adjust macro to zero-init new flagnames field.
	(DF):  Add new macro like D but allows setting flagnames.
	(init[]):  Add zero-initialised flagnames members where needed, and
	new entry for new __dll_characteristics__ PE value.
	(gld_${EMULATION_NAME}_list_options):  Document new option.
	(find_pep_flag_name):  New helper to search definfoflag arrays.
	(find_pep_name):  New helper broken out from set_pe_name.
	(set_pep_name):  Use it.
	(is_flag_sep):  New helper function to test separator characters.
	(set_pep_value_from_flags):  New function parses mixed flagnames and
	integers format to set a PE value.
	(gld${EMULATION_NAME}_handle_option):  Call it to handle new
	OPTION_PE_DLL_CHARACTERISTICS option.

ld/testsuite/ChangeLog

	* lib/ld-lib.exp (run_dump_test):  Allow new 'sed'
	option in .d files for post-processing output dump file.
	* ld-pe/dllcharact-1.d, ld-pe/dllcharact-2.d, ld-pe/dllcharact-3.d,
	ld-pe/dllcharact-4.d, ld-pe/dllcharact-5.d, ld-pe/dllcharact-fail-1.d
	ld-pe/dllcharact-fail-2.d, ld-pe/dllcharact-fail-3.d, ld-pe/empty.s,
	ld-pe/dllcharact-fail-4.d, ld-pe/dllcharact.exp:  New test files.

    cheers,
      DaveK


[-- Attachment #2: pe-dll-characteristics-patch.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 28913 bytes --]

Index: include/coff/internal.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/include/coff/internal.h,v
retrieving revision 1.22
diff -p -u -r1.22 internal.h
--- include/coff/internal.h	12 Jul 2007 07:16:41 -0000	1.22
+++ include/coff/internal.h	5 Mar 2009 12:30:04 -0000
@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ struct internal_extra_pe_aouthdr 
      3 - WINDOWS_CUI runs in Windows char sub. (console app)
      5 - OS2_CUI runs in OS/2 character subsystem
      7 - POSIX_CUI runs in Posix character subsystem */
-  short   DllCharacteristics;	/* flags for DLL init, use 0 */
+  unsigned short DllCharacteristics;	/* flags for DLL init, use 0 */
   bfd_vma SizeOfStackReserve;	/* amount of memory to reserve  */
   bfd_vma SizeOfStackCommit;	/* amount of memory initially committed for 
 				   initial thread's stack, default is 0x1000 */
Index: include/coff/pe.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/include/coff/pe.h,v
retrieving revision 1.18
diff -p -u -r1.18 pe.h
--- include/coff/pe.h	4 Nov 2007 23:49:08 -0000	1.18
+++ include/coff/pe.h	5 Mar 2009 12:30:04 -0000
@@ -38,6 +38,17 @@
 #define IMAGE_FILE_UP_SYSTEM_ONLY            0x4000
 #define IMAGE_FILE_BYTES_REVERSED_HI         0x8000
 
+/* DllCharacteristics flag bits.  The inconsistent naming may seem
+   odd, but that is how they are defined in the PE specification.  */
+#define IMAGE_DLL_CHARACTERISTICS_DYNAMIC_BASE          0x0040
+#define IMAGE_DLL_CHARACTERISTICS_FORCE_INTEGRITY       0x0080
+#define IMAGE_DLL_CHARACTERISTICS_NX_COMPAT             0x0100
+#define IMAGE_DLLCHARACTERISTICS_NO_ISOLATION           0x0200
+#define IMAGE_DLLCHARACTERISTICS_NO_SEH                 0x0400
+#define IMAGE_DLLCHARACTERISTICS_NO_BIND                0x0800
+#define IMAGE_DLLCHARACTERISTICS_WDM_DRIVER             0x2000
+#define IMAGE_DLLCHARACTERISTICS_TERMINAL_SERVER_AWARE  0x8000
+
 /* Additional flags to be set for section headers to allow the NT loader to
    read and write to the section data (to replace the addresses of data in
    dlls for one thing); also to execute the section in .text's case.  */
Index: ld/NEWS
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/ld/NEWS,v
retrieving revision 1.100
diff -p -u -r1.100 NEWS
--- ld/NEWS	3 Mar 2009 18:22:10 -0000	1.100
+++ ld/NEWS	5 Mar 2009 12:30:04 -0000
@@ -1,5 +1,9 @@
 -*- text -*-
 
+* A new command-line flag '--pe-dll-characteristics' allows PE targets
+  to set the value of the PE file header's DllCharacteristics field,
+  using a flexible combination of numeric and symbolic names.
+
 * New script function REGION_ALIAS to add alias names to memory regions.
 
 * PE targets no longer make use of the long section names PE extension to
Index: ld/ld.texinfo
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/ld/ld.texinfo,v
retrieving revision 1.235
diff -p -u -r1.235 ld.texinfo
--- ld/ld.texinfo	3 Mar 2009 18:22:10 -0000	1.235
+++ ld/ld.texinfo	5 Mar 2009 12:30:06 -0000
@@ -2257,6 +2257,57 @@ Sets the minor number of the ``os versio
 Sets the minor number of the ``subsystem version''.  Defaults to 0.
 [This option is specific to the i386 PE targeted port of the linker]
 
+@kindex --pe-dll-characteristics
+@item --pe-dll-characteristics (@var{name}|@var{integer})@*@	@w{@	}@	@w{@	}@	@w{@	}@	@w{@	}[(',' | '|' | '+' | ':')(@var{name}|@var{integer})[...]]
+Sets the value of the DllCharacteristics field in the PE header.  The
+value can be specified by using hexadecimal or decimal integers, or the
+symbolic names of the various bits, optionally combined by any combination
+of @samp{|}, @samp{+}, @samp{:} or @samp{,} characters.  The following
+short symbolic names are recognized, shown with the full name of the flag
+(as given in the MS PE specification) to which they correspond, which is
+also accepted:
+
+@table @samp
+@item dynbase
+@samp{IMAGE_DLL_CHARACTERISTICS_DYNAMIC_BASE}
+
+@item forceinteg
+@samp{IMAGE_DLL_CHARACTERISTICS_FORCE_INTEGRITY}
+
+@item nxcompat
+@samp{IMAGE_DLL_CHARACTERISTICS_NX_COMPAT}
+
+@item noisolation
+@samp{IMAGE_DLLCHARACTERISTICS_NO_ISOLATION}
+
+@item noseh
+@samp{IMAGE_DLLCHARACTERISTICS_NO_SEH}
+
+@item nobind
+@samp{IMAGE_DLLCHARACTERISTICS_NO_BIND}
+
+@item wdmdriver
+@samp{IMAGE_DLLCHARACTERISTICS_WDM_DRIVER}
+
+@item tsaware
+@samp{IMAGE_DLLCHARACTERISTICS_TERMINAL_SERVER_AWARE}
+
+@end table
+These options and separators can be combined with almost total
+flexibility; for example, valid uses of this option include:
+
+@smallexample
+--pe-dll-characteristics=0x0400|0x0100
+@end smallexample
+@smallexample
+--pe-dll-characteristics=1+128+1024,noseh,nobind
+@end smallexample
+@smallexample
+--pe-dll-characteristics noseh:nobind:tsaware
+@end smallexample
+
+[This option is valid for all PE targeted ports of the linker]
+
 @cindex DEF files, creating
 @cindex DLLs, creating
 @kindex --output-def
Index: ld/emultempl/pe.em
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/ld/emultempl/pe.em,v
retrieving revision 1.146
diff -p -u -r1.146 pe.em
--- ld/emultempl/pe.em	3 Mar 2009 18:22:11 -0000	1.146
+++ ld/emultempl/pe.em	5 Mar 2009 12:30:06 -0000
@@ -229,6 +229,8 @@ fragment <<EOF
 					(OPTION_USE_NUL_PREFIXED_IMPORT_TABLES + 1)
 #define OPTION_DISABLE_LONG_SECTION_NAMES \
 					(OPTION_ENABLE_LONG_SECTION_NAMES + 1)
+#define OPTION_PE_DLL_CHARACTERISTICS \
+					(OPTION_DISABLE_LONG_SECTION_NAMES + 1)
 
 static void
 gld${EMULATION_NAME}_add_options
@@ -290,6 +292,7 @@ gld${EMULATION_NAME}_add_options
     {"large-address-aware", no_argument, NULL, OPTION_LARGE_ADDRESS_AWARE},
     {"enable-long-section-names", no_argument, NULL, OPTION_ENABLE_LONG_SECTION_NAMES},
     {"disable-long-section-names", no_argument, NULL, OPTION_DISABLE_LONG_SECTION_NAMES},
+    {"pe-dll-characteristics", required_argument, NULL, OPTION_PE_DLL_CHARACTERISTICS},
     {NULL, no_argument, NULL, 0}
   };
 
@@ -303,14 +306,47 @@ gld${EMULATION_NAME}_add_options
 
 typedef struct
 {
+  const char *name;
+  int len;
+  int value;
+} definfoflag;
+
+#define C(name)       { #name, sizeof(#name) - 1, name }
+#define CF(name,flag) { #name, sizeof(#name) - 1, flag }
+static const definfoflag dllchrctnames[] =
+{
+  /* Accept a few handy abbreviations.  */
+  CF(dynbase,     IMAGE_DLL_CHARACTERISTICS_DYNAMIC_BASE),
+  CF(forceinteg,  IMAGE_DLL_CHARACTERISTICS_FORCE_INTEGRITY),
+  CF(nxcompat,    IMAGE_DLL_CHARACTERISTICS_NX_COMPAT),
+  CF(noisolation, IMAGE_DLLCHARACTERISTICS_NO_ISOLATION),
+  CF(noseh,       IMAGE_DLLCHARACTERISTICS_NO_SEH),
+  CF(nobind,      IMAGE_DLLCHARACTERISTICS_NO_BIND),
+  CF(wdmdriver,   IMAGE_DLLCHARACTERISTICS_WDM_DRIVER),
+  CF(tsaware,     IMAGE_DLLCHARACTERISTICS_TERMINAL_SERVER_AWARE),
+  /* And the full names as defined in the PE specification.  */
+  C(IMAGE_DLL_CHARACTERISTICS_DYNAMIC_BASE),
+  C(IMAGE_DLL_CHARACTERISTICS_FORCE_INTEGRITY),
+  C(IMAGE_DLL_CHARACTERISTICS_NX_COMPAT),
+  C(IMAGE_DLLCHARACTERISTICS_NO_ISOLATION),
+  C(IMAGE_DLLCHARACTERISTICS_NO_SEH),
+  C(IMAGE_DLLCHARACTERISTICS_WDM_DRIVER),
+  C(IMAGE_DLLCHARACTERISTICS_TERMINAL_SERVER_AWARE),
+  { 0, 0, 0 },
+};
+
+typedef struct
+{
   void *ptr;
   int size;
   int value;
   char *symbol;
   int inited;
+  const definfoflag *flagnames;
 } definfo;
 
-#define D(field,symbol,def)  {&pe.field,sizeof(pe.field), def, symbol,0}
+#define D(field,symbol,def)         {&pe.field,sizeof(pe.field), def, symbol, 0, 0}
+#define DF(field,symbol,def,flags)  {&pe.field,sizeof(pe.field), def, symbol, 0, flags}
 
 static definfo init[] =
 {
@@ -318,7 +354,7 @@ static definfo init[] =
 #define IMAGEBASEOFF 0
   D(ImageBase,"__image_base__", NT_EXE_IMAGE_BASE),
 #define DLLOFF 1
-  {&dll, sizeof(dll), 0, "__dll__", 0},
+  {&dll, sizeof(dll), 0, "__dll__", 0, 0},
 #define MSIMAGEBASEOFF	2
   D(ImageBase, U ("__ImageBase"), NT_EXE_IMAGE_BASE),
   D(SectionAlignment,"__section_alignment__", PE_DEF_SECTION_ALIGNMENT),
@@ -339,10 +375,10 @@ static definfo init[] =
   D(SizeOfHeapReserve,"__size_of_heap_reserve__", 0x100000),
   D(SizeOfHeapCommit,"__size_of_heap_commit__", 0x1000),
   D(LoaderFlags,"__loader_flags__", 0x0),
-  { NULL, 0, 0, NULL, 0 }
+  DF(DllCharacteristics, "__dll_characteristics__", 0x0, dllchrctnames),
+  { NULL, 0, 0, NULL, 0, 0 }
 };
 
-
 static void
 gld_${EMULATION_NAME}_list_options (FILE *file)
 {
@@ -401,29 +437,48 @@ gld_${EMULATION_NAME}_list_options (FILE
                                        executable image files\n"));
   fprintf (file, _("  --disable-long-section-names       Never use long COFF section names, even\n\
                                        in object files\n"));
+  fprintf (file, _("  --pe-dll-characteristics <name|int>[<,|+:><name|int>[...]]\n\
+                                     Sets PE header DllCharacteristics field.\n"));
 }
 
+static const definfoflag *
+find_pe_flag_name (char *name, const definfoflag *flagnames)
+{
+  int i;
 
-static void
-set_pe_name (char *name, long val)
+  /* Look for the name, return pointer to definfoflag if found.  */
+  if (flagnames)
+    for (i = 0; flagnames[i].name; i++)
+      if (strncmp (name, flagnames[i].name, flagnames[i].len) == 0)
+	return &flagnames[i];
+  /* Unknown name could be an integer, so not an error here.  */
+  return 0;
+}
+
+static definfo *
+find_pe_name (char *name)
 {
   int i;
 
-  /* Find the name and set it.  */
+  /* Look for the name, return pointer to definfo.  */
   for (i = 0; init[i].ptr; i++)
-    {
-      if (strcmp (name, init[i].symbol) == 0)
-	{
-	  init[i].value = val;
-	  init[i].inited = 1;
-	  if (strcmp (name,"__image_base__") == 0)
-	    set_pe_name (U ("__ImageBase"), val);
-	  return;
-	}
-    }
+    if (strcmp (name, init[i].symbol) == 0)
+      return &init[i];
+  /* Unknown name is a serious internal coding error, so don't
+     bother to diagnose or return error indication, just bail.  */
   abort ();
 }
 
+static void
+set_pe_name (char *name, long val)
+{
+  /* Find the name and set it.  */
+  definfo *init = find_pe_name (name);
+  init->value = val;
+  init->inited = 1;
+  if (strcmp (name,"__image_base__") == 0)
+    set_pe_name (U ("__ImageBase"), val);
+}
 
 static void
 set_pe_subsystem (void)
@@ -543,6 +598,62 @@ set_pe_value (char *name)
   optarg = end;
 }
 
+static char
+is_flag_sep (char x)
+{
+  return x == '+' || x == '|' || x == ':' || x == ',';
+}
+
+static void
+set_pe_value_from_flags (char *name)
+{
+  long flags = 0;
+  definfo *init;
+
+  /* Look up the symbolic flag names.  Even if there aren't any we
+     will still parse multiple integers combined by separators.  */
+  init = find_pe_name (name);
+
+  /* Parse the flags out of optarg.  We accept any combination of
+     symbolic abbreviations and strtoul-parseable integers, separated
+     by any combination of '+', '|', ':' and ',' characters.  */
+  while (*optarg)
+    {
+      const definfoflag *flag;
+
+      /* Deliberately allow multiple conjoined separators.  */
+      while (is_flag_sep (*optarg))
+	optarg++;
+
+      /* Even trailing at the end.  */
+      if (!*optarg)
+	break;
+
+      flag = find_pe_flag_name (optarg, init->flagnames);
+      if (flag)
+	{
+	  flags |= flag->value;
+	  optarg += flag->len;
+	}
+      else
+	{
+	  char *end;
+	  long value;
+	  value = strtoul (optarg, &end, 0);
+	  if (end == optarg)
+	    einfo (_("%P%F: unrecognised integer/flag '%s' for PE parameter '%s'\n"),
+		optarg, name);
+	  flags |= value;
+	  optarg = end;
+	}
+      /* If there's any more, we do insist on at least one separator.  */
+      if (*optarg && !is_flag_sep (*optarg))
+	einfo (_("%P%F: unparseable at '%s' for PE parameter '%s'\n"),
+	  optarg, name);
+    }
+
+  set_pe_name (name,  flags);
+}
 
 static void
 set_pe_stack_heap (char *resname, char *comname)
@@ -707,6 +818,9 @@ gld${EMULATION_NAME}_handle_option (int 
     case OPTION_DISABLE_LONG_SECTION_NAMES:
       pe_use_coff_long_section_names = 0;
       break;
+    case OPTION_PE_DLL_CHARACTERISTICS:
+      set_pe_value_from_flags ("__dll_characteristics__");
+      break;
     }
   return TRUE;
 }
Index: ld/emultempl/pep.em
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/ld/emultempl/pep.em,v
retrieving revision 1.23
diff -p -u -r1.23 pep.em
--- ld/emultempl/pep.em	3 Mar 2009 18:22:11 -0000	1.23
+++ ld/emultempl/pep.em	5 Mar 2009 12:30:07 -0000
@@ -179,7 +179,8 @@ enum options
   OPTION_EXCLUDE_MODULES_FOR_IMPLIB,
   OPTION_USE_NUL_PREFIXED_IMPORT_TABLES,
   OPTION_ENABLE_LONG_SECTION_NAMES,
-  OPTION_DISABLE_LONG_SECTION_NAMES
+  OPTION_DISABLE_LONG_SECTION_NAMES,
+  OPTION_PE_DLL_CHARACTERISTICS
 };
 
 static void
@@ -244,6 +245,7 @@ gld${EMULATION_NAME}_add_options
 #endif
     {"enable-long-section-names", no_argument, NULL, OPTION_ENABLE_LONG_SECTION_NAMES},
     {"disable-long-section-names", no_argument, NULL, OPTION_DISABLE_LONG_SECTION_NAMES},
+    {"pe-dll-characteristics", required_argument, NULL, OPTION_PE_DLL_CHARACTERISTICS},
     {NULL, no_argument, NULL, 0}
   };
 
@@ -256,14 +258,47 @@ gld${EMULATION_NAME}_add_options
 
 typedef struct
 {
+  const char *name;
+  int len;
+  int value;
+} definfoflag;
+
+#define C(name)       { #name, sizeof(#name) - 1, name }
+#define CF(name,flag) { #name, sizeof(#name) - 1, flag }
+static const definfoflag dllchrctnames[] =
+{
+  /* Accept a few handy abbreviations.  */
+  CF(dynbase,     IMAGE_DLL_CHARACTERISTICS_DYNAMIC_BASE),
+  CF(forceinteg,  IMAGE_DLL_CHARACTERISTICS_FORCE_INTEGRITY),
+  CF(nxcompat,    IMAGE_DLL_CHARACTERISTICS_NX_COMPAT),
+  CF(noisolation, IMAGE_DLLCHARACTERISTICS_NO_ISOLATION),
+  CF(noseh,       IMAGE_DLLCHARACTERISTICS_NO_SEH),
+  CF(nobind,      IMAGE_DLLCHARACTERISTICS_NO_BIND),
+  CF(wdmdriver,   IMAGE_DLLCHARACTERISTICS_WDM_DRIVER),
+  CF(tsaware,     IMAGE_DLLCHARACTERISTICS_TERMINAL_SERVER_AWARE),
+  /* And the full names as defined in the PE specification.  */
+  C(IMAGE_DLL_CHARACTERISTICS_DYNAMIC_BASE),
+  C(IMAGE_DLL_CHARACTERISTICS_FORCE_INTEGRITY),
+  C(IMAGE_DLL_CHARACTERISTICS_NX_COMPAT),
+  C(IMAGE_DLLCHARACTERISTICS_NO_ISOLATION),
+  C(IMAGE_DLLCHARACTERISTICS_NO_SEH),
+  C(IMAGE_DLLCHARACTERISTICS_WDM_DRIVER),
+  C(IMAGE_DLLCHARACTERISTICS_TERMINAL_SERVER_AWARE),
+  { 0, 0, 0 },
+};
+
+typedef struct
+{
   void *ptr;
   int size;
   bfd_vma value;
   char *symbol;
   int inited;
+  const definfoflag *flagnames;
 } definfo;
 
-#define D(field,symbol,def)  {&pep.field,sizeof(pep.field), def, symbol,0}
+#define D(field,symbol,def)         {&pep.field,sizeof(pep.field), def, symbol, 0, 0}
+#define DF(field,symbol,def,flags)  {&pep.field,sizeof(pep.field), def, symbol, 0, flags}
 
 static definfo init[] =
 {
@@ -271,7 +306,7 @@ static definfo init[] =
 #define IMAGEBASEOFF 0
   D(ImageBase,"__image_base__", NT_EXE_IMAGE_BASE),
 #define DLLOFF 1
-  {&dll, sizeof(dll), 0, "__dll__", 0},
+  {&dll, sizeof(dll), 0, "__dll__", 0, 0},
 #define MSIMAGEBASEOFF	2
   D(ImageBase,"___ImageBase", NT_EXE_IMAGE_BASE),
   D(SectionAlignment,"__section_alignment__", PE_DEF_SECTION_ALIGNMENT),
@@ -288,7 +323,8 @@ static definfo init[] =
   D(SizeOfHeapReserve,"__size_of_heap_reserve__", 0x100000),
   D(SizeOfHeapCommit,"__size_of_heap_commit__", 0x1000),
   D(LoaderFlags,"__loader_flags__", 0x0),
-  { NULL, 0, 0, NULL, 0 }
+  DF(DllCharacteristics, "__dll_characteristics__", 0x0, dllchrctnames),
+  { NULL, 0, 0, NULL, 0, 0 }
 };
 
 
@@ -346,30 +382,49 @@ gld_${EMULATION_NAME}_list_options (FILE
                                        executable image files\n"));
   fprintf (file, _("  --disable-long-section-names       Never use long COFF section names, even\n\
                                        in object files\n"));
+  fprintf (file, _("  --pe-dll-characteristics <name|int>[<,|+:><name|int>[...]]\n\
+                                     Sets PE header DllCharacteristics field.\n"));
 #endif
 }
 
+static const definfoflag *
+find_pep_flag_name (char *name, const definfoflag *flagnames)
+{
+  int i;
 
-static void
-set_pep_name (char *name, bfd_vma val)
+  /* Look for the name, return pointer to definfoflag if found.  */
+  if (flagnames)
+    for (i = 0; flagnames[i].name; i++)
+      if (strncmp (name, flagnames[i].name, flagnames[i].len) == 0)
+	return &flagnames[i];
+  /* Unknown name could be an integer, so not an error here.  */
+  return 0;
+}
+
+static definfo *
+find_pep_name (char *name)
 {
   int i;
 
-  /* Find the name and set it.  */
+  /* Look for the name, return pointer to definfo.  */
   for (i = 0; init[i].ptr; i++)
-    {
-      if (strcmp (name, init[i].symbol) == 0)
-	{
-	  init[i].value = val;
-	  init[i].inited = 1;
-	  if (strcmp (name,"__image_base__") == 0)
-	    set_pep_name ("___ImageBase", val);
-	  return;
-	}
-    }
+    if (strcmp (name, init[i].symbol) == 0)
+      return &init[i];
+  /* Unknown name is a serious internal coding error, so don't
+     bother to diagnose or return error indication, just bail.  */
   abort ();
 }
 
+static void
+set_pep_name (char *name, long val)
+{
+  /* Find the name and set it.  */
+  definfo *init = find_pep_name (name);
+  init->value = val;
+  init->inited = 1;
+  if (strcmp (name,"__image_base__") == 0)
+    set_pep_name ("___ImageBase", val);
+}
 
 static void
 set_pep_subsystem (void)
@@ -489,6 +544,62 @@ set_pep_value (char *name)
   optarg = end;
 }
 
+static char
+is_flag_sep (char x)
+{
+  return x == '+' || x == '|' || x == ':' || x == ',';
+}
+
+static void
+set_pep_value_from_flags (char *name)
+{
+  long flags = 0;
+  definfo *init;
+
+  /* Look up the symbolic flag names.  Even if there aren't any we
+     will still parse multiple integers combined by separators.  */
+  init = find_pep_name (name);
+
+  /* Parse the flags out of optarg.  We accept any combination of
+     symbolic abbreviations and strtoul-parseable integers, separated
+     by any combination of '+', '|', ':' and ',' characters.  */
+  while (*optarg)
+    {
+      const definfoflag *flag;
+
+      /* Deliberately allow multiple conjoined separators.  */
+      while (is_flag_sep (*optarg))
+	optarg++;
+
+      /* Even trailing at the end.  */
+      if (!*optarg)
+	break;
+
+      flag = find_pep_flag_name (optarg, init->flagnames);
+      if (flag)
+	{
+	  flags |= flag->value;
+	  optarg += flag->len;
+	}
+      else
+	{
+	  char *end;
+	  long value;
+	  value = strtoul (optarg, &end, 0);
+	  if (end == optarg)
+	    einfo (_("%P%F: unrecognised integer/flag '%s' for PE parameter '%s'\n"),
+		optarg, name);
+	  flags |= value;
+	  optarg = end;
+	}
+      /* If there's any more, we do insist on at least one separator.  */
+      if (*optarg && !is_flag_sep (*optarg))
+	einfo (_("%P%F: unparseable at '%s' for PE parameter '%s'\n"),
+	  optarg, name);
+    }
+
+  set_pep_name (name,  flags);
+}
 
 static void
 set_pep_stack_heap (char *resname, char *comname)
@@ -647,6 +758,9 @@ gld${EMULATION_NAME}_handle_option (int 
     case OPTION_DISABLE_LONG_SECTION_NAMES:
       pep_use_coff_long_section_names = 0;
       break;
+    case OPTION_PE_DLL_CHARACTERISTICS:
+      set_pep_value_from_flags ("__dll_characteristics__");
+      break;
     }
   return TRUE;
 }
Index: ld/testsuite/ld-pe/dllcharact-1.d
===================================================================
RCS file: ld/testsuite/ld-pe/dllcharact-1.d
diff -N ld/testsuite/ld-pe/dllcharact-1.d
--- /dev/null	1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ ld/testsuite/ld-pe/dllcharact-1.d	5 Mar 2009 12:30:07 -0000
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+#name: pe-dll-characteristics-1
+#ld:  --pe-dll-characteristics=1+128+512:nxcompat\\|wdmdriver\\|forceinteg
+#objdump: -p
+#sed: -e '/^DllCharacteristics/!d'
+#source: empty.s
+
+DllCharacteristics[ \t]*00002381
Index: ld/testsuite/ld-pe/dllcharact-2.d
===================================================================
RCS file: ld/testsuite/ld-pe/dllcharact-2.d
diff -N ld/testsuite/ld-pe/dllcharact-2.d
--- /dev/null	1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ ld/testsuite/ld-pe/dllcharact-2.d	5 Mar 2009 12:30:07 -0000
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+#name: pe-dll-characteristics-2
+#ld: --pe-dll-characteristics=0x1234
+#objdump: -p
+#sed: -e '/^DllCharacteristics/!d'
+#source: empty.s
+
+DllCharacteristics[ \t]*00001234
Index: ld/testsuite/ld-pe/dllcharact-3.d
===================================================================
RCS file: ld/testsuite/ld-pe/dllcharact-3.d
diff -N ld/testsuite/ld-pe/dllcharact-3.d
--- /dev/null	1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ ld/testsuite/ld-pe/dllcharact-3.d	5 Mar 2009 12:30:07 -0000
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+#name: pe-dll-characteristics-3
+#ld:  --pe-dll-characteristics noseh:nobind:tsaware
+#objdump: -p
+#sed: -e '/^DllCharacteristics/!d'
+#source: empty.s
+
+DllCharacteristics[ \t]*00008c00
Index: ld/testsuite/ld-pe/dllcharact-4.d
===================================================================
RCS file: ld/testsuite/ld-pe/dllcharact-4.d
diff -N ld/testsuite/ld-pe/dllcharact-4.d
--- /dev/null	1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ ld/testsuite/ld-pe/dllcharact-4.d	5 Mar 2009 12:30:07 -0000
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+#name: pe-dll-characteristics-4
+#ld:  --pe-dll-characteristics=0x0400\\|0x0100
+#objdump: -p
+#sed: -e '/^DllCharacteristics/!d'
+#source: empty.s
+
+DllCharacteristics[ \t]*00000500
Index: ld/testsuite/ld-pe/dllcharact-5.d
===================================================================
RCS file: ld/testsuite/ld-pe/dllcharact-5.d
diff -N ld/testsuite/ld-pe/dllcharact-5.d
--- /dev/null	1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ ld/testsuite/ld-pe/dllcharact-5.d	5 Mar 2009 12:30:07 -0000
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+#name: pe-dll-characteristics-5
+#ld:  --pe-dll-characteristics=1+128+1024,noseh,nobind
+#objdump: -p
+#sed: -e '/^DllCharacteristics/!d'
+#source: empty.s
+
+DllCharacteristics[ \t]*00000c81
Index: ld/testsuite/ld-pe/dllcharact-fail-1.d
===================================================================
RCS file: ld/testsuite/ld-pe/dllcharact-fail-1.d
diff -N ld/testsuite/ld-pe/dllcharact-fail-1.d
--- /dev/null	1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ ld/testsuite/ld-pe/dllcharact-fail-1.d	5 Mar 2009 12:30:07 -0000
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+#name: pe-dll-characteristics-fail-1
+#ld:  --pe-dll-characteristics=1+0xf00:+badname+
+#error: .*unrecognised integer/flag.*
+#source: empty.s
Index: ld/testsuite/ld-pe/dllcharact-fail-2.d
===================================================================
RCS file: ld/testsuite/ld-pe/dllcharact-fail-2.d
diff -N ld/testsuite/ld-pe/dllcharact-fail-2.d
--- /dev/null	1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ ld/testsuite/ld-pe/dllcharact-fail-2.d	5 Mar 2009 12:30:07 -0000
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+#name: pe-dll-characteristics-fail-2
+#ld:  --pe-dll-characteristics=0xGoWrong:noseh
+#error: .*(unrecognised integer/flag '0xGoWrong:noseh'|unparseable at 'xGoWrong:noseh').*
+#source: empty.s
+
+## This one was interesting.  Different libc strtoul implementations appear to
+## behave differently: newlib regards '0x' as a hex prefix followed by an invalid
+## hex number, GNU libc parses it as an integer zero followed by an 'x'.  This
+## could well be a bug in newlib.
Index: ld/testsuite/ld-pe/dllcharact-fail-3.d
===================================================================
RCS file: ld/testsuite/ld-pe/dllcharact-fail-3.d
diff -N ld/testsuite/ld-pe/dllcharact-fail-3.d
--- /dev/null	1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ ld/testsuite/ld-pe/dllcharact-fail-3.d	5 Mar 2009 12:30:07 -0000
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+#name: pe-dll-characteristics-fail-3
+#ld:  --pe-dll-characteristics 0x3DFG
+#error: .*unparseable at.*
+#source: empty.s
Index: ld/testsuite/ld-pe/dllcharact-fail-4.d
===================================================================
RCS file: ld/testsuite/ld-pe/dllcharact-fail-4.d
diff -N ld/testsuite/ld-pe/dllcharact-fail-4.d
--- /dev/null	1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ ld/testsuite/ld-pe/dllcharact-fail-4.d	5 Mar 2009 12:30:07 -0000
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+#name: pe-dll-characteristics-fail-4
+#ld:  --pe-dll-characteristics 1+noseh+0x3DFnobind
+#error: .*unparseable at.*
+#source: empty.s
Index: ld/testsuite/ld-pe/dllcharact.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: ld/testsuite/ld-pe/dllcharact.exp
diff -N ld/testsuite/ld-pe/dllcharact.exp
--- /dev/null	1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ ld/testsuite/ld-pe/dllcharact.exp	5 Mar 2009 12:30:07 -0000
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+# Expect script for --pe-dll-characteristics command-line option tests.
+#   Copyright 2009
+#   Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+#
+# This file is part of the GNU Binutils.
+#
+# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+# the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
+# (at your option) any later version.
+#
+# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
+# GNU General Public License for more details.
+#
+# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+# along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
+# Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street - Fifth Floor, Boston,
+# MA 02110-1301, USA.
+#
+ 
+# This test can only be run on PE/COFF platforms.
+if {![is_pecoff_format]} {
+    return
+}
+
+# Now we repeatedly re-link it with different args, 
+# and check that the field gets set correctly.
+
+run_dump_test "dllcharact-1"
+run_dump_test "dllcharact-2"
+run_dump_test "dllcharact-3"
+run_dump_test "dllcharact-4"
+run_dump_test "dllcharact-5"
+
+run_dump_test "dllcharact-fail-1"
+run_dump_test "dllcharact-fail-2"
+run_dump_test "dllcharact-fail-3"
+run_dump_test "dllcharact-fail-4"
+
+
+
Index: ld/testsuite/ld-pe/empty.s
===================================================================
RCS file: ld/testsuite/ld-pe/empty.s
diff -N ld/testsuite/ld-pe/empty.s
--- /dev/null	1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ ld/testsuite/ld-pe/empty.s	5 Mar 2009 12:30:07 -0000
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+	.text
+	.global _start
+	.global _mainCRTStartup
+_start:
+_mainCRTStartup:
+	.end
+
Index: ld/testsuite/lib/ld-lib.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/ld/testsuite/lib/ld-lib.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.59
diff -p -u -r1.59 ld-lib.exp
--- ld/testsuite/lib/ld-lib.exp	6 Feb 2009 16:56:12 -0000	1.59
+++ ld/testsuite/lib/ld-lib.exp	5 Mar 2009 12:30:07 -0000
@@ -582,11 +582,17 @@ proc simple_diff { file_1 file_2 } {
 #   objdump: FLAGS
 #   nm: FLAGS
 #   objcopy: FLAGS
+#   readelf: FLAGS
 #	Use the specified program to analyze the assembler or linker
 #       output file, and pass it FLAGS, in addition to the output name.
 #	Note that they are run with LC_ALL=C in the environment to give
 #	consistent sorting of symbols.
 #
+#   sed: FLAGS
+#       Run SED with the specified flags on the analyzer output dump
+#       file to perform custom post-processing, before attempting to
+#       match it against the pattern lines.
+#
 #   source: SOURCE [FLAGS]
 #	Assemble the file SOURCE.s using the flags in the "as" directive
 #       and the (optional) FLAGS.  If omitted, the source defaults to
@@ -661,6 +667,7 @@ proc run_dump_test { name } {
     set opts(nm) {}
     set opts(objcopy) {}
     set opts(readelf) {}
+    set opts(sed) {}
     set opts(name) {}
     set opts(PROG) {}
     set opts(source) {}
@@ -917,20 +924,31 @@ proc run_dump_test { name } {
     if { $progopts1 == "" } { set $progopts1 "-r" }
     verbose "running $binary $progopts $progopts1" 3
 
-    # Objcopy, unlike the other two, won't send its output to stdout,
-    # so we have to run it specially.
-    set cmd "$binary $progopts $progopts1 $objfile > $dumpfile"
-    if { $program == "objcopy" } {
-	set cmd "$binary $progopts $progopts1 $objfile $dumpfile"
+    # Must be ready to post-process the dumpfile, if need be.  Objcopy,
+    # unlike the other two, won't send its output to stdout, so we have
+    # to run it specially.
+    if { $opts(sed) != "" } {
+	set cmdoutput "| sed $opts(sed) > $dumpfile"
+	if { $program == "objcopy" } {
+	    set cmdoutput "$dumpfile.1 && sed $opts(sed) < $dumpfile.1 > $dumpfile"
+	}
+    } else {
+	set cmdoutput "> $dumpfile"
+	if { $program == "objcopy" } {
+	    set cmdoutput "$dumpfile"
+	}
     }
 
+    # Generate the main command line, minus redirects.
+    set cmd "$binary $progopts $progopts1 $objfile"
+
     # Ensure consistent sorting of symbols
     if {[info exists env(LC_ALL)]} {
 	set old_lc_all $env(LC_ALL)
     }
     set env(LC_ALL) "C"
     send_log "$cmd\n"
-    set cmdret [remote_exec host [concat sh -c [list "$cmd 2>ld.tmp"]] "" "/dev/null"]
+    set cmdret [remote_exec host [concat sh -c [list "$cmd 2>ld.tmp $cmdoutput"]] "" "/dev/null"]
     remote_upload host "ld.tmp"
     set comp_output [prune_warnings [file_contents "ld.tmp"]]
     remote_file host delete "ld.tmp"

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 36+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] New --pe-dll-characteristcs switch for PE ld.
@ 2009-03-06 19:25 Charles Wilson
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 36+ messages in thread
From: Charles Wilson @ 2009-03-06 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: binutils; +Cc: cygwin

[oops. I replied to a non-existent list, so binutils never saw this and
cygwin will see it twice. Sorry about that]

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> I would like to see an objcopy option at some point.  I don't agree with
> the prevailing cygwin opinion that you need a separate binary to deal
> with this.  It seems silly to have objcopy able to do only some things
> to a PE and, if objcopy can do this, then I don't see why you need an
> extra program to manipulate this field.

I agree that objcopy should be able to manipulate this (these) field(s).
However, having a simple tool that does a simple thing is The Unix Way.
Having a giant do-everything tool is...not.  For that we have Perl. <g>

[The following gets OT for binutils; I've CC:ed the cygwin list. If you
wish to continue this subthread, please take it over there]

Seriously, with regards to cygwin though, there are a few important
reasons for the bit-twiddler program to be separate from  objcopy, even
if it duplicates some of its functionality.

1) we're going to recommend that -- until everything in the cygwin
   distro is rebuilt using a not-yet-available ld with new defaults --
   users (including lusers and n00bs) -- run a bit-twiddler tool on
   many, if not all, of the DLLs and EXEs in their installation. It
   would be bad if this tool was developer-centric, with lots of
   confusing (to the uninitiated) options that have the potential to
   seriously foul up the target object(s) in unrecoverable ways, if used
   incorrectly.  Like objcopy.  The bit-twiddler proggie, being so
   simple and limited in scope, can always revert any changes it makes.
   Even when used by a n00b.

2) Do we really want all users -- who might not be developers -- who
   happen to run in to a particular problem be forced to download and
   install all of binutils, just for objcopy?

3) We're dealing with an issue where EXEs will not operate at all if
   they do not have the correct DllCharacteristics bits.  Which exes
   suffer from this limitation is not immediately obvious, and we don't
   know what triggers the misbehavior (on WindowsTS, at least). So far
   we are "lucky" -- it appears that the binutils tools such as nm and
   objcopy are NOT affected by this issue, but we don't know why, nor if
   our "luck" will change in the future. In the end, we might be forced
   to distribute the bit-twiddler as a mingw app, not a cygwin one. I
   don't think we (cygwin) want to distribute a standalone version of
   i686-pc-mingw32-objcopy, nor as in #2 above, force all users (who
   happen to run in to ...) to download mingw-cross-binutils.

4) The behavior of a specific bit-twiddler program can be tweaked to
   better suit our intended purpose: to be called on a large list of
   files ONCE to perform similar operations on all of those files, thus
   avoiding lots of forks.  This is important not just for speed, but
   also because the dynbase issue is the solution to a problem that
   fails specifically when you're doing a lot of forks. (Granted, you
   could avoid this latter issue by ensuring that the bit-twiddler
   program -- be it objdump or peflags -- itself is only shipped with
   the dynbase flag preset). But AFAIK objdump is not meant to operate
   in a "SIMD" manner -- that is, do the same operation on an entire
   list of target objects. Rather, objcopy takes exactly two file names:
   one input and one optional output.  If the output file isn't
   specified, then the temporary modified version is renamed over the
   input (which is the behavior we'd want to exploit for a make-all-
   dynbase script -- or we'd do the rename manually IN that script,
   having given objcopy an explicit temporary name for its output).
   That's a lot of extra disk writes and data copying -- again, slow.
   peflags operates inplace.

5) Why does cygwin ship rebase? Technically objcopy could and should do
   this, too (even though that particular operation is a lot more
   complicated than just setting a value in the PE file's header). But
   #1 thru #4 above all also apply with regards to rebase.exe, even if
   objcopy had that capability.

--
Chuck

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 36+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] New --pe-dll-characteristcs switch for PE ld.
@ 2009-03-08 22:21 Charles Wilson
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 36+ messages in thread
From: Charles Wilson @ 2009-03-08 22:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: binutils

Dave Korn wrote:
> Christopher Faylor wrote: 
>> or --pe-characteristics.
> 
>   I could live with this, because it's part of the optional PE header, and the
> Characteristics field is part of the base COFF header, so could in theory be
> denoted by "--coff-characteristics".

FWIW, I like this suggestion.  Using

   --pe-characteristics
	manipulate flags in the DllCharacteristics field of the
	output object's "optional" PE header. When MS defined
	the PE format and decided to name this field, they picked
	a poor name: it really isn't DLL specific at all.  This
	field is really a PE extension to the base COFF
	characteristics...

This would leave room later for

    --coff-characteristics
	manipulate flags in the Characteristics field of the output
	object's base COFF header. (I think just plain
	"--characteristics" is way too ambiguous, for either field).

--
Chuck

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 36+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] New --pe-dll-characteristcs switch for PE ld.
@ 2009-03-09 15:58 Charles Wilson
  2009-03-09 16:49 ` Christopher Faylor
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 36+ messages in thread
From: Charles Wilson @ 2009-03-09 15:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: binutils

> The ld option would not represent a mask.  It is just an arbitrary collection
> of keyworeds.  You are grouping suboptions together only because Microsoft 
> decided to have disparate behavior controlled by one unsigned short field
> in the PE header.

Ah. I see what the problem is.

Dave and I are thinking: "There is an important field in the EXE/DLL
header.  We need a way to conveniently set the value of this field. 
Since the field is composed of various flags, one obvious convenient
mechanism is to allow setting those flags in the field symbolically.  Or
also numerically, all at once.  But, the operation is one atomic
transaction: set the field."

This naturally leads to a single command line option (for the field),
with parseable suboptions (for each flag).

You're thinking: "There are a number of flags that are important in the
EXE/DLL header.  We should be able to set those flags.  These flags are
each independent logical entities -- regardless of how Microsoft
implemented them in the PE header itself, as bit-members of a single
field, multiple fields, whatever.  The ld user doesn't care -- he just
needs to be able to set each flag."

This naturally leads to multiple command line options -- one for each
flag. 

I can see the argument for both.  Can't we have both?

--
Chuck

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 36+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-03-13  8:33 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-03-05 12:49 [PATCH] New --pe-dll-characteristcs switch for PE ld Dave Korn
2009-03-06  5:47 ` Christopher Faylor
2009-03-06  6:38   ` Dave Korn
2009-03-06  8:17     ` Danny Smith
2009-03-06 16:24       ` Christopher Faylor
2009-03-06 13:11     ` Vincent R.
2009-03-06 13:31       ` Kai Tietz
2009-03-06 16:13     ` Christopher Faylor
2009-03-06 16:33       ` Dave Korn
2009-03-06 23:40         ` Christopher Faylor
2009-03-07  5:00           ` Dave Korn
2009-03-09  5:24             ` Christopher Faylor
2009-03-09  6:14               ` Dave Korn
2009-03-09 15:37                 ` Christopher Faylor
2009-03-09 16:06                   ` Dave Korn
2009-03-09 17:17                     ` NightStrike
2009-03-09 17:23                       ` Christopher Faylor
2009-03-09 17:24                       ` Dave Korn
2009-03-12  7:42                         ` Danny Smith
2009-03-12  8:12                           ` Dave Korn
2009-03-12 13:51                             ` Nick Clifton
2009-03-12 13:59                               ` Dave Korn
2009-03-12 17:28                                 ` Dave Korn
2009-03-12 18:03                                   ` Dave Korn
2009-03-13  3:10                                     ` Dave Korn
2009-03-13  8:33                                       ` Nick Clifton
2009-03-12 14:00                           ` Christopher Faylor
2009-03-09  1:13         ` Dave Korn
2009-03-09  5:47           ` Dave Korn
2009-03-09  9:35           ` Vincent R.
2009-03-06 19:25 Charles Wilson
2009-03-08 22:21 Charles Wilson
2009-03-09 15:58 Charles Wilson
2009-03-09 16:49 ` Christopher Faylor
2009-03-09 17:02   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-03-09 17:09     ` Christopher Faylor

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).