* cvs checkout glitch
@ 2010-07-07 20:40 NightStrike
2010-07-08 18:56 ` Dave Korn
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: NightStrike @ 2010-07-07 20:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: binutils
Why do I see this during a cvs checkout of binutils?
cvs checkout: warning: ./src/config.if is not (any longer) pertinent
cvs checkout: warning: ./src/configure.in is not (any longer) pertinent
cvs checkout: warning: ./src/gettext.m4 is not (any longer) pertinent
cvs checkout: warning: ./src/ltcf-c.sh is not (any longer) pertinent
cvs checkout: warning: ./src/ltcf-cxx.sh is not (any longer) pertinent
cvs checkout: warning: ./src/ltcf-gcj.sh is not (any longer) pertinent
cvs checkout: warning: ./src/ltconfig is not (any longer) pertinent
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: cvs checkout glitch
2010-07-07 20:40 cvs checkout glitch NightStrike
@ 2010-07-08 18:56 ` Dave Korn
2010-08-19 20:47 ` NightStrike
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Dave Korn @ 2010-07-08 18:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: NightStrike; +Cc: binutils
On 07/07/2010 21:40, NightStrike wrote:
> Why do I see this during a cvs checkout of binutils?
>
> cvs checkout: warning: ./src/config.if is not (any longer) pertinent
> cvs checkout: warning: ./src/configure.in is not (any longer) pertinent
> cvs checkout: warning: ./src/gettext.m4 is not (any longer) pertinent
> cvs checkout: warning: ./src/ltcf-c.sh is not (any longer) pertinent
> cvs checkout: warning: ./src/ltcf-cxx.sh is not (any longer) pertinent
> cvs checkout: warning: ./src/ltcf-gcj.sh is not (any longer) pertinent
> cvs checkout: warning: ./src/ltconfig is not (any longer) pertinent
It's just how CVS works. Some side-effect of using modules and having stuff
in the attic. It can be safely ignored.
cheers,
DaveK
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: cvs checkout glitch
2010-07-08 18:56 ` Dave Korn
@ 2010-08-19 20:47 ` NightStrike
2010-08-19 20:48 ` Mike Frysinger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: NightStrike @ 2010-08-19 20:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Korn; +Cc: binutils
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Dave Korn <dave.korn.cygwin@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 07/07/2010 21:40, NightStrike wrote:
>> Why do I see this during a cvs checkout of binutils?
>>
>> cvs checkout: warning: ./src/config.if is not (any longer) pertinent
>> cvs checkout: warning: ./src/configure.in is not (any longer) pertinent
>> cvs checkout: warning: ./src/gettext.m4 is not (any longer) pertinent
>> cvs checkout: warning: ./src/ltcf-c.sh is not (any longer) pertinent
>> cvs checkout: warning: ./src/ltcf-cxx.sh is not (any longer) pertinent
>> cvs checkout: warning: ./src/ltcf-gcj.sh is not (any longer) pertinent
>> cvs checkout: warning: ./src/ltconfig is not (any longer) pertinent
>
> It's just how CVS works. Some side-effect of using modules and having stuff
> in the attic. It can be safely ignored.
>
> cheers,
> DaveK
>
>
Will it always be like that now, or will that eventually go away?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: cvs checkout glitch
2010-08-19 20:47 ` NightStrike
@ 2010-08-19 20:48 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-08-19 20:52 ` NightStrike
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2010-08-19 20:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: binutils; +Cc: NightStrike, Dave Korn
[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 1013 bytes --]
On Thursday, August 19, 2010 16:43:56 NightStrike wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Dave Korn wrote:
> > On 07/07/2010 21:40, NightStrike wrote:
> >> Why do I see this during a cvs checkout of binutils?
> >>
> >> cvs checkout: warning: ./src/config.if is not (any longer) pertinent
> >> cvs checkout: warning: ./src/configure.in is not (any longer) pertinent
> >> cvs checkout: warning: ./src/gettext.m4 is not (any longer) pertinent
> >> cvs checkout: warning: ./src/ltcf-c.sh is not (any longer) pertinent
> >> cvs checkout: warning: ./src/ltcf-cxx.sh is not (any longer) pertinent
> >> cvs checkout: warning: ./src/ltcf-gcj.sh is not (any longer) pertinent
> >> cvs checkout: warning: ./src/ltconfig is not (any longer) pertinent
> >
> > It's just how CVS works. Some side-effect of using modules and having
> > stuff in the attic. It can be safely ignored.
>
> Will it always be like that now, or will that eventually go away?
it'll go away when you stop using cvs ...
-mike
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: cvs checkout glitch
2010-08-19 20:48 ` Mike Frysinger
@ 2010-08-19 20:52 ` NightStrike
2010-08-19 21:05 ` H.J. Lu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: NightStrike @ 2010-08-19 20:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mike Frysinger; +Cc: binutils, Dave Korn
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Thursday, August 19, 2010 16:43:56 NightStrike wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Dave Korn wrote:
>> > On 07/07/2010 21:40, NightStrike wrote:
>> >> Why do I see this during a cvs checkout of binutils?
>> >>
>> >> cvs checkout: warning: ./src/config.if is not (any longer) pertinent
>> >> cvs checkout: warning: ./src/configure.in is not (any longer) pertinent
>> >> cvs checkout: warning: ./src/gettext.m4 is not (any longer) pertinent
>> >> cvs checkout: warning: ./src/ltcf-c.sh is not (any longer) pertinent
>> >> cvs checkout: warning: ./src/ltcf-cxx.sh is not (any longer) pertinent
>> >> cvs checkout: warning: ./src/ltcf-gcj.sh is not (any longer) pertinent
>> >> cvs checkout: warning: ./src/ltconfig is not (any longer) pertinent
>> >
>> > It's just how CVS works. Some side-effect of using modules and having
>> > stuff in the attic. It can be safely ignored.
>>
>> Will it always be like that now, or will that eventually go away?
>
> it'll go away when you stop using cvs ...
> -mike
>
How else do you checkout the binutils cvs repo?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: cvs checkout glitch
2010-08-19 20:52 ` NightStrike
@ 2010-08-19 21:05 ` H.J. Lu
2010-08-19 21:11 ` Sebastian Pop
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: H.J. Lu @ 2010-08-19 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: NightStrike; +Cc: Mike Frysinger, binutils, Dave Korn
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 1:48 PM, NightStrike <nightstrike@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> On Thursday, August 19, 2010 16:43:56 NightStrike wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Dave Korn wrote:
>>> > On 07/07/2010 21:40, NightStrike wrote:
>>> >> Why do I see this during a cvs checkout of binutils?
>>> >>
>>> >> cvs checkout: warning: ./src/config.if is not (any longer) pertinent
>>> >> cvs checkout: warning: ./src/configure.in is not (any longer) pertinent
>>> >> cvs checkout: warning: ./src/gettext.m4 is not (any longer) pertinent
>>> >> cvs checkout: warning: ./src/ltcf-c.sh is not (any longer) pertinent
>>> >> cvs checkout: warning: ./src/ltcf-cxx.sh is not (any longer) pertinent
>>> >> cvs checkout: warning: ./src/ltcf-gcj.sh is not (any longer) pertinent
>>> >> cvs checkout: warning: ./src/ltconfig is not (any longer) pertinent
>>> >
>>> > It's just how CVS works. Some side-effect of using modules and having
>>> > stuff in the attic. It can be safely ignored.
>>>
>>> Will it always be like that now, or will that eventually go away?
>>
>> it'll go away when you stop using cvs ...
>> -mike
>>
>
> How else do you checkout the binutils cvs repo?
I use the git mirror.
--
H.J.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: cvs checkout glitch
2010-08-19 21:05 ` H.J. Lu
@ 2010-08-19 21:11 ` Sebastian Pop
2010-08-19 21:40 ` Mike Frysinger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Sebastian Pop @ 2010-08-19 21:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: H.J. Lu; +Cc: NightStrike, Mike Frysinger, binutils, Dave Korn
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 15:52, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 1:48 PM, NightStrike <nightstrike@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
>>> On Thursday, August 19, 2010 16:43:56 NightStrike wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Dave Korn wrote:
>>>> > On 07/07/2010 21:40, NightStrike wrote:
>>>> >> Why do I see this during a cvs checkout of binutils?
>>>> >>
>>>> >> cvs checkout: warning: ./src/config.if is not (any longer) pertinent
>>>> >> cvs checkout: warning: ./src/configure.in is not (any longer) pertinent
>>>> >> cvs checkout: warning: ./src/gettext.m4 is not (any longer) pertinent
>>>> >> cvs checkout: warning: ./src/ltcf-c.sh is not (any longer) pertinent
>>>> >> cvs checkout: warning: ./src/ltcf-cxx.sh is not (any longer) pertinent
>>>> >> cvs checkout: warning: ./src/ltcf-gcj.sh is not (any longer) pertinent
>>>> >> cvs checkout: warning: ./src/ltconfig is not (any longer) pertinent
>>>> >
>>>> > It's just how CVS works. Some side-effect of using modules and having
>>>> > stuff in the attic. It can be safely ignored.
>>>>
>>>> Will it always be like that now, or will that eventually go away?
>>>
>>> it'll go away when you stop using cvs ...
>>> -mike
>>>
>>
>> How else do you checkout the binutils cvs repo?
>
>
> I use the git mirror.
Where is the binutils git mirror located?
Thanks,
Sebastian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: cvs checkout glitch
2010-08-19 21:11 ` Sebastian Pop
@ 2010-08-19 21:40 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-08-30 17:00 ` Quentin Neill
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2010-08-19 21:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sebastian Pop; +Cc: H.J. Lu, NightStrike, binutils, Dave Korn
[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 129 bytes --]
On Thursday, August 19, 2010 17:08:31 Sebastian Pop wrote:
> Where is the binutils git mirror located?
sourceware.org/git
-mike
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: cvs checkout glitch
2010-08-19 21:40 ` Mike Frysinger
@ 2010-08-30 17:00 ` Quentin Neill
2010-08-30 17:12 ` Mike Frysinger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Quentin Neill @ 2010-08-30 17:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mike Frysinger, binutils; +Cc: Sebastian Pop, H.J. Lu, NightStrike, Dave Korn
How does this one play with the one on github mentioned in
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-05/msg00221.html
-- Quentin
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Thursday, August 19, 2010 17:08:31 Sebastian Pop wrote:
>> Where is the binutils git mirror located?
>
> sourceware.org/git
> -mike
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: cvs checkout glitch
2010-08-30 17:00 ` Quentin Neill
@ 2010-08-30 17:12 ` Mike Frysinger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2010-08-30 17:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Quentin Neill; +Cc: binutils, Sebastian Pop, H.J. Lu, NightStrike, Dave Korn
[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 302 bytes --]
On Monday, August 30, 2010 11:10:10 Quentin Neill wrote:
please dont top post
> How does this one play with the one on github mentioned in
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-05/msg00221.html
you' have to ask Jie. the sourceware.org ones are as official as it gets
though.
-mike
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-08-30 17:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-07-07 20:40 cvs checkout glitch NightStrike
2010-07-08 18:56 ` Dave Korn
2010-08-19 20:47 ` NightStrike
2010-08-19 20:48 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-08-19 20:52 ` NightStrike
2010-08-19 21:05 ` H.J. Lu
2010-08-19 21:11 ` Sebastian Pop
2010-08-19 21:40 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-08-30 17:00 ` Quentin Neill
2010-08-30 17:12 ` Mike Frysinger
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).