From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24786 invoked by alias); 21 Sep 2010 00:32:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 24777 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Sep 2010 00:32:11 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-pz0-f41.google.com (HELO mail-pz0-f41.google.com) (209.85.210.41) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 00:32:06 +0000 Received: by pzk26 with SMTP id 26so3437888pzk.0 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 17:32:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.50.15 with SMTP id x15mr8363951wfx.295.1285029125284; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 17:32:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bubble.grove.modra.org ([115.187.252.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o9sm7734124wfd.4.2010.09.20.17.32.02 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 20 Sep 2010 17:32:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by bubble.grove.modra.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 78D4A170C206; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 10:01:58 +0930 (CST) Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 00:32:00 -0000 From: Alan Modra To: Richard Earnshaw Cc: binutils@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Release 2.21 - rough schedule Message-ID: <20100921003158.GL16874@bubble.grove.modra.org> Mail-Followup-To: Richard Earnshaw , binutils@sourceware.org References: <48A902C2-D801-401E-8FC1-3E5179D66B70@adacore.com> <20100918025913.GG16874@bubble.grove.modra.org> <1284997687.13878.32.camel@e102346-lin.cambridge.arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1284997687.13878.32.camel@e102346-lin.cambridge.arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-09/txt/msg00316.txt.bz2 On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 04:48:07PM +0100, Richard Earnshaw wrote: > > On Sat, 2010-09-18 at 12:29 +0930, Alan Modra wrote: > > arm-aout arm-coff arm-epoc-pe arm-linux arm-netbsdelf arm-none-eabi arm-nto arm-pe arm-symbianelf arm-vxworks arm-wince-pe > > So arm-linux isn't very interesting these days, and nor is arm-aout > (which I'm surprised we still claim to support at all). But Deprecate it. If ARM maintainers aren't interested in a target it's likely that users are better served by staying with an older version of binutils. > arm-linux-gnueabi is very important (as its a primary GCC target). I think I stole the list of arm targets from Nick, quite a while ago. Please suggest a better (preferably smaller!) list. -- Alan Modra Australia Development Lab, IBM