From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10710 invoked by alias); 9 Jul 2011 16:52:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 10700 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Jul 2011 16:52:48 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,TW_FX,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from hall.aurel32.net (HELO hall.aurel32.net) (88.191.126.93) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 16:52:33 +0000 Received: from aurel32 by hall.aurel32.net with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QfalZ-0007hP-Nq; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 18:52:29 +0200 Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 18:18:00 -0000 From: Aurelien Jarno To: Tristan Gingold Cc: Nick Clifton , binutils Development Subject: Re: Ping [Patch v2] bfd elfxx-ia64: share code between elf32 and elf64 Message-ID: <20110709165229.GA8780@hall.aurel32.net> References: <1149AB82-D754-4792-98C1-C677ABE5E712@adacore.com> <9F58AE27-C095-4B50-B3D4-1DF60454A382@adacore.com> <6ACB9B6C-7640-473A-9047-7AFB4C789D49@adacore.com> <4DDBB7CD.40902@redhat.com> <9C0F5E39-7514-4996-AA9B-26478EEAAD79@adacore.com> <4DDCADE9.4020405@redhat.com> <049A78A6-0E98-4631-BB9B-27A6B9527D37@adacore.com> <20110705182906.GB19197@volta.aurel32.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-07/txt/msg00104.txt.bz2 On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 08:45:56AM +0200, Tristan Gingold wrote: > > On Jul 5, 2011, at 8:29 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > Hello Tristan, > > [...] > > > This patch seems to break libc on ia64. ld-2.13.so produced with > > binutils using this patch works when called as a standalone, but just > > segfault when used with other binaries: > > [...] > > > I don't know what is the best way to proceed for debugging this issue. I > > can provide you the correct and the broken ld.so if it can help. > > This patch shouldn't have made any functional change, but ... > > It would be useful if you could send (either directly to me or just open a bugzilla entry) *all* the object files required to build > ld.so and the 'ld' command line to build it. This is now done in bugzilla entry 12978. Thanks, Aurelien -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurelien@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net