From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31352 invoked by alias); 20 May 2014 09:21:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 31328 invoked by uid 89); 20 May 2014 09:21:31 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-pd0-f181.google.com Received: from mail-pd0-f181.google.com (HELO mail-pd0-f181.google.com) (209.85.192.181) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 20 May 2014 09:21:30 +0000 Received: by mail-pd0-f181.google.com with SMTP id z10so148333pdj.26 for ; Tue, 20 May 2014 02:21:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.68.171.193 with SMTP id aw1mr48722057pbc.117.1400577688194; Tue, 20 May 2014 02:21:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bubble.grove.modra.org ([101.166.26.37]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id sv10sm2081996pbc.74.2014.05.20.02.21.26 for (version=TLSv1.1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 20 May 2014 02:21:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by bubble.grove.modra.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 86DCEEA00F1; Tue, 20 May 2014 18:51:23 +0930 (CST) Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 09:21:00 -0000 From: Alan Modra To: Hans-Peter Nilsson Cc: binutils@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA:] fix PR ld/16963, missing SEARCH_DIR for non-sysroot cross-builds Message-ID: <20140520092123.GQ5162@bubble.grove.modra.org> Mail-Followup-To: Hans-Peter Nilsson , binutils@sourceware.org References: <201405192248.s4JMm94P020825@ignucius.se.axis.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201405192248.s4JMm94P020825@ignucius.se.axis.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-05/txt/msg00171.txt.bz2 On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 12:48:09AM +0200, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: > There seems to be no reason to have a separate rule for each > invocation, when using a central rule would suffice. Only that we've avoided depending on GNU make so far. I'm not against the idea, if Nick wants to make that change. -- Alan Modra Australia Development Lab, IBM