From: Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Cc: Joe Groff <jgroff@apple.com>, Cary Coutant <ccoutant@gmail.com>,
Binutils <binutils@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: Preventing preemption of 'protected' symbols in GNU ld 2.26
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 01:44:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160330014403.GI15812@bubble.grove.modra.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMe9rOqNcYnm1YocG-m7XNDE0g68YQAGe=ULP-G98gaatpxSeA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 12:54:36PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> Protected symbol never worked correctly on x86 before. My
> change closed a few long-standing bugs. There is no going-back.
The swift bug report and this thread should be telling you that
protected visibility symbols don't work correctly *now* on x86.
They did in fact work correctly before your changes, but had many
annoying restrictions. Those restrictions, all due to non-PIC, can be
overcome in a number of ways without breaking shared libraries.
eg. ppc32 is non-PIC by default just like x64, but see bfd/elf32-ppc.c
/* Convert lis;addi or lis;load/store accessing a protected
variable defined in a shared library to PIC. */
Yes, this makes ppc32 executables slower. I'd rather that than making
shared libraries slower.
FWIW, I agree with all the points Cary makes in
https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2016-03/msg00331.html.
--
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-30 1:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 89+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <AB592ABD-D6D7-4D2F-A0D6-45738F168DC4@apple.com>
2016-03-29 19:31 ` Fwd: " Joe Groff
2016-03-29 19:33 ` H.J. Lu
2016-03-29 19:36 ` Joe Groff
2016-03-29 19:43 ` H.J. Lu
2016-03-29 19:51 ` Joe Groff
2016-03-29 19:54 ` H.J. Lu
2016-03-29 22:05 ` H.J. Lu
2016-03-30 1:44 ` Alan Modra [this message]
2016-03-30 1:46 ` Cary Coutant
2016-03-30 4:04 ` Jeff Law
2016-03-30 7:20 ` Cary Coutant
2016-03-30 7:34 ` Cary Coutant
2016-03-30 14:44 ` Alan Modra
2016-03-31 0:45 ` Cary Coutant
2016-04-15 21:49 ` Preventing preemption of 'protected' symbols in GNU ld 2.26 [aka should we revert the fix for 65248] Jeff Law
2016-04-15 21:56 ` H.J. Lu
2016-04-18 9:02 ` Richard Biener
2016-04-18 14:49 ` Alan Modra
2016-04-18 14:59 ` H.J. Lu
2016-04-18 17:04 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2016-04-18 17:09 ` H.J. Lu
2016-04-18 17:24 ` Michael Matz
2016-04-18 17:27 ` H.J. Lu
2016-04-18 18:52 ` Jakub Jelinek
2016-04-18 19:28 ` H.J. Lu
2016-04-18 17:55 ` Cary Coutant
2016-04-25 17:24 ` Jeff Law
2016-04-25 17:31 ` H.J. Lu
2016-04-18 17:57 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2016-04-19 5:08 ` Alan Modra
2016-04-19 8:20 ` Richard Biener
2016-04-19 9:53 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2016-04-19 14:06 ` Michael Matz
2016-04-19 15:37 ` Cary Coutant
2016-04-19 15:44 ` H.J. Lu
2016-04-19 15:52 ` H.J. Lu
2016-04-19 15:54 ` H.J. Lu
2016-04-19 15:58 ` Cary Coutant
2016-04-19 16:00 ` H.J. Lu
2016-04-19 15:54 ` Cary Coutant
2016-04-19 19:11 ` H.J. Lu
2016-04-19 20:17 ` Rich Felker
2016-04-19 21:03 ` Cary Coutant
2016-04-20 17:45 ` anonymous
2016-04-19 15:46 ` Alan Modra
2016-04-25 17:35 ` Jeff Law
2016-04-26 5:55 ` Alan Modra
2016-04-26 8:13 ` Jakub Jelinek
2016-04-18 17:05 ` Cary Coutant
2016-03-31 0:40 ` Preventing preemption of 'protected' symbols in GNU ld 2.26 Cary Coutant
2016-03-31 0:53 ` Jeff Law
2016-03-31 13:27 ` Ramana Radhakrishnan
2016-03-31 15:05 ` H.J. Lu
2016-04-15 16:10 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2016-04-01 19:51 ` Jeff Law
2016-04-02 2:53 ` Alan Modra
2016-04-19 19:47 ` Fwd: " Rich Felker
2016-04-15 16:16 H.J. Lu
2016-04-15 16:36 ` Jeff Law
2016-04-15 16:45 ` H.J. Lu
2016-04-15 16:43 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2016-04-15 23:59 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2016-04-16 1:08 ` Szabolcs Nagy
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-03-24 0:00 Joe Groff
2016-03-24 0:45 ` H.J. Lu
2016-03-24 0:52 ` Joe Groff
2016-03-24 1:25 ` H.J. Lu
2016-03-24 15:01 ` Cary Coutant
2016-03-24 15:07 ` H.J. Lu
2016-03-24 16:06 ` Cary Coutant
2016-03-24 16:42 ` H.J. Lu
2016-03-24 16:56 ` Cary Coutant
2016-03-24 17:05 ` H.J. Lu
2016-03-24 17:06 ` Joe Groff
2016-03-24 17:09 ` H.J. Lu
2016-03-24 18:31 ` Cary Coutant
2016-03-27 16:26 ` Rafael Espíndola
2016-03-28 12:12 ` H.J. Lu
[not found] ` <BC969B3B-87A2-4238-90C8-DA2E166707AF@apple.com>
2016-03-28 17:03 ` Joe Groff
2016-03-28 17:17 ` H.J. Lu
2016-03-28 22:22 ` Cary Coutant
2016-03-28 22:24 ` Joe Groff
2016-03-28 22:38 ` Cary Coutant
2016-03-28 22:41 ` Joe Groff
2016-03-28 23:21 ` Alan Modra
2016-03-29 0:29 ` Cary Coutant
2016-03-29 15:44 ` H.J. Lu
2016-03-28 22:12 ` Cary Coutant
2016-03-29 12:40 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160330014403.GI15812@bubble.grove.modra.org \
--to=amodra@gmail.com \
--cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
--cc=ccoutant@gmail.com \
--cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
--cc=jgroff@apple.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).