Missing TO_ADDR

Missing TO_ADDR

[Alan Modra]

Calculates the wrong end address on targets with octets_per_byte
not equal to one.

	* ldlang.c (lang_size_sections_1): Correct code detecting a
	backward non-overlapping move.

diff --git a/ld/ldlang.c b/ld/ldlang.c
index 235a246..b369f99 100644
--- a/ld/ldlang.c
+++ b/ld/ldlang.c
@@ -5068,7 +5068,7 @@ lang_size_sections_1
 		   create overlapping LMAs.  */
 		if (dot < last->vma
 		    && os->bfd_section->size != 0
-		    && dot + os->bfd_section->size <= last->vma)
+		    && dot + TO_ADDR (os->bfd_section->size) <= last->vma)
 		  {
 		    /* If dot moved backwards then leave lma equal to
 		       vma.  This is the old default lma, which might

-- 
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM

Re: Missing TO_ADDR

[Dan]

Don't forget the "minfo ("0x%V %W", section->vma ..." line that needs
its "section->size" parameter changed to TO_ADDR(section->size), or the
"lma = last->lma+last->size" that needs to be changed to "lma =
last->lma + TO_ADDR(last->size);".  At least according to my last git
pull, those changes still needed to be made as well.

Dan



On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 18:01 +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
> Calculates the wrong end address on targets with octets_per_byte
> not equal to one.
> 
> 	* ldlang.c (lang_size_sections_1): Correct code detecting a
> 	backward non-overlapping move.
> 
> diff --git a/ld/ldlang.c b/ld/ldlang.c
> index 235a246..b369f99 100644
> --- a/ld/ldlang.c
> +++ b/ld/ldlang.c
> @@ -5068,7 +5068,7 @@ lang_size_sections_1
>  		   create overlapping LMAs.  */
>  		if (dot < last->vma
>  		    && os->bfd_section->size != 0
> -		    && dot + os->bfd_section->size <= last->vma)
> +		    && dot + TO_ADDR (os->bfd_section->size) <= last->vma)
>  		  {
>  		    /* If dot moved backwards then leave lma equal to
>  		       vma.  This is the old default lma, which might
> 

Re: Missing TO_ADDR

[Alan Modra]

On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 08:04:44AM -0400, Dan wrote:
> Don't forget the "minfo ("0x%V %W", section->vma ..." line that needs
> its "section->size" parameter changed to TO_ADDR(section->size), or the
> "lma = last->lma+last->size" that needs to be changed to "lma =
> last->lma + TO_ADDR(last->size);".  At least according to my last git
> pull, those changes still needed to be made as well.

Yes, there are other places missing TO_ADDR, and one of the minfo
lines wrongly invokes TO_ADDR.  Thanks for the prod.

	* ldlang.c (TO_ADDR, TO_SIZE, opb_shift): Move earlier in file.
	(lang_insert_orphan): Use TO_ADDR in __stop sym calculation.
	(print_input_section): Don't use TO_ADDR when printing section
	size.
	(lang_size_sections_1): Use TO_ADDR in overlay lma calculation.
	(lang_size_sections): Use TO_ADDR in relro end calculation.

diff --git a/ld/ldlang.c b/ld/ldlang.c
index cb6aab6..9fca810 100644
--- a/ld/ldlang.c
+++ b/ld/ldlang.c
@@ -49,7 +49,13 @@
 #define offsetof(TYPE, MEMBER) ((size_t) & (((TYPE*) 0)->MEMBER))
 #endif
 
-/* Locals variables.  */
+/* Convert between addresses in bytes and sizes in octets.
+   For currently supported targets, octets_per_byte is always a power
+   of two, so we can use shifts.  */
+#define TO_ADDR(X) ((X) >> opb_shift)
+#define TO_SIZE(X) ((X) << opb_shift)
+
+/* Local variables.  */
 static struct obstack stat_obstack;
 static struct obstack map_obstack;
 
@@ -68,6 +74,7 @@ static lang_statement_list_type *stat_save[10];
 static lang_statement_list_type **stat_save_ptr = &stat_save[0];
 static struct unique_sections *unique_section_list;
 static struct asneeded_minfo *asneeded_list_head;
+static unsigned int opb_shift = 0;
 static bfd_boolean maybe_overlays = FALSE;
 
 /* Forward declarations.  */
@@ -1887,7 +1894,7 @@ lang_insert_orphan (asection *s,
 	 before sizing dynamic sections.  */
       dot = os->bfd_section->vma;
       exp_fold_tree (start_assign->exp, os->bfd_section, &dot);
-      dot += s->size;
+      dot += TO_ADDR (s->size);
       exp_fold_tree (stop_assign->exp, os->bfd_section, &dot);
     }
 
@@ -3209,15 +3216,6 @@ ldlang_open_output (lang_statement_union_type *statement)
     }
 }
 
-/* Convert between addresses in bytes and sizes in octets.
-   For currently supported targets, octets_per_byte is always a power
-   of two, so we can use shifts.  */
-#define TO_ADDR(X) ((X) >> opb_shift)
-#define TO_SIZE(X) ((X) << opb_shift)
-
-/* Support the above.  */
-static unsigned int opb_shift = 0;
-
 static void
 init_opb (void)
 {
@@ -4225,7 +4223,7 @@ print_input_section (asection *i, bfd_boolean is_discarded)
 	size = 0;
     }
 
-  minfo ("0x%V %W %B\n", addr, TO_ADDR (size), i->owner);
+  minfo ("0x%V %W %B\n", addr, size, i->owner);
 
   if (size != i->rawsize && i->rawsize != 0)
     {
@@ -5132,7 +5130,7 @@ lang_size_sections_1
 		    /* If this is an overlay, set the current lma to that
 		       at the end of the previous section.  */
 		    if (os->sectype == overlay_section)
-		      lma = last->lma + last->size;
+		      lma = last->lma + TO_ADDR (last->size);
 
 		    /* Otherwise, keep the same lma to vma relationship
 		       as the previous section.  */
@@ -5524,7 +5522,7 @@ lang_size_sections (bfd_boolean *relax, bfd_boolean check_regions)
 
 	    end = start = sec->vma;
 	    if (!IS_TBSS (sec))
-	      end += sec->size;
+	      end += TO_ADDR (sec->size);
 	    bump = desired_end - end;
 	    /* We'd like to increase START by BUMP, but we must heed
 	       alignment so the increase might be less than optimum.  */

-- 
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM

Re: Missing TO_ADDR

[Dan]

Are you sure you want to take the TO_SIZE directives *away* from the
minfo statements?  With the TO_SIZE directives, the addresses add up:
last address plus size adds up to the next address, and you can see
nothing missing.  Without the TO_SIZE directives, the units don't match.

Dan


On Thu, 2016-03-31 at 18:09 +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 08:04:44AM -0400, Dan wrote:
> > Don't forget the "minfo ("0x%V %W", section->vma ..." line that needs
> > its "section->size" parameter changed to TO_ADDR(section->size), or the
> > "lma = last->lma+last->size" that needs to be changed to "lma =
> > last->lma + TO_ADDR(last->size);".  At least according to my last git
> > pull, those changes still needed to be made as well.
> 
> Yes, there are other places missing TO_ADDR, and one of the minfo
> lines wrongly invokes TO_ADDR.  Thanks for the prod.
> 
> 	* ldlang.c (TO_ADDR, TO_SIZE, opb_shift): Move earlier in file.
> 	(lang_insert_orphan): Use TO_ADDR in __stop sym calculation.
> 	(print_input_section): Don't use TO_ADDR when printing section
> 	size.
> 	(lang_size_sections_1): Use TO_ADDR in overlay lma calculation.
> 	(lang_size_sections): Use TO_ADDR in relro end calculation.
> 
> diff --git a/ld/ldlang.c b/ld/ldlang.c
> index cb6aab6..9fca810 100644
> --- a/ld/ldlang.c
> +++ b/ld/ldlang.c
> @@ -49,7 +49,13 @@
>  #define offsetof(TYPE, MEMBER) ((size_t) & (((TYPE*) 0)->MEMBER))
>  #endif
>  
> -/* Locals variables.  */
> +/* Convert between addresses in bytes and sizes in octets.
> +   For currently supported targets, octets_per_byte is always a power
> +   of two, so we can use shifts.  */
> +#define TO_ADDR(X) ((X) >> opb_shift)
> +#define TO_SIZE(X) ((X) << opb_shift)
> +
> +/* Local variables.  */
>  static struct obstack stat_obstack;
>  static struct obstack map_obstack;
>  
> @@ -68,6 +74,7 @@ static lang_statement_list_type *stat_save[10];
>  static lang_statement_list_type **stat_save_ptr = &stat_save[0];
>  static struct unique_sections *unique_section_list;
>  static struct asneeded_minfo *asneeded_list_head;
> +static unsigned int opb_shift = 0;
>  static bfd_boolean maybe_overlays = FALSE;
>  
>  /* Forward declarations.  */
> @@ -1887,7 +1894,7 @@ lang_insert_orphan (asection *s,
>  	 before sizing dynamic sections.  */
>        dot = os->bfd_section->vma;
>        exp_fold_tree (start_assign->exp, os->bfd_section, &dot);
> -      dot += s->size;
> +      dot += TO_ADDR (s->size);
>        exp_fold_tree (stop_assign->exp, os->bfd_section, &dot);
>      }
>  
> @@ -3209,15 +3216,6 @@ ldlang_open_output (lang_statement_union_type *statement)
>      }
>  }
>  
> -/* Convert between addresses in bytes and sizes in octets.
> -   For currently supported targets, octets_per_byte is always a power
> -   of two, so we can use shifts.  */
> -#define TO_ADDR(X) ((X) >> opb_shift)
> -#define TO_SIZE(X) ((X) << opb_shift)
> -
> -/* Support the above.  */
> -static unsigned int opb_shift = 0;
> -
>  static void
>  init_opb (void)
>  {
> @@ -4225,7 +4223,7 @@ print_input_section (asection *i, bfd_boolean is_discarded)
>  	size = 0;
>      }
>  
> -  minfo ("0x%V %W %B\n", addr, TO_ADDR (size), i->owner);
> +  minfo ("0x%V %W %B\n", addr, size, i->owner);
>  
>    if (size != i->rawsize && i->rawsize != 0)
>      {
> @@ -5132,7 +5130,7 @@ lang_size_sections_1
>  		    /* If this is an overlay, set the current lma to that
>  		       at the end of the previous section.  */
>  		    if (os->sectype == overlay_section)
> -		      lma = last->lma + last->size;
> +		      lma = last->lma + TO_ADDR (last->size);
>  
>  		    /* Otherwise, keep the same lma to vma relationship
>  		       as the previous section.  */
> @@ -5524,7 +5522,7 @@ lang_size_sections (bfd_boolean *relax, bfd_boolean check_regions)
>  
>  	    end = start = sec->vma;
>  	    if (!IS_TBSS (sec))
> -	      end += sec->size;
> +	      end += TO_ADDR (sec->size);
>  	    bump = desired_end - end;
>  	    /* We'd like to increase START by BUMP, but we must heed
>  	       alignment so the increase might be less than optimum.  */
> 

Re: Missing TO_ADDR

[Dan]

This would be my proposal for what to change:

--- a/ld/ldlang.c	2016-03-31 11:52:02.147253098 -0400
+++ b/ld/ldlang.c	2016-03-31 12:01:13.039773821 -0400
@@ -1886,7 +1886,7 @@
 	 before sizing dynamic sections.  */
       dot = os->bfd_section->vma;
       exp_fold_tree (start_assign->exp, os->bfd_section, &dot);
-      dot += s->size;
+      dot += TO_ADDR(s->size);
       exp_fold_tree (stop_assign->exp, os->bfd_section, &dot);
     }
 
@@ -4002,7 +4002,7 @@
 	      ++len;
 	    }
 
-	  minfo ("0x%V %W", section->vma, section->size);
+	  minfo ("0x%V %W", section->vma, TO_ADDR(section->size));
 
 	  if (section->vma != section->lma)
 	    minfo (_(" load address 0x%V"), section->lma);
@@ -4312,7 +4312,9 @@
       break;
     }
 
-  minfo ("0x%V %W %s 0x%v", addr, size, name, data->value);
+  if (size < TO_SIZE ((unsigned) 1))
+    size = TO_SIZE ((unsigned) 1);
+  minfo ("0x%V %W %s 0x%v", addr, TO_ADDR(size), name, data->value);
 
   if (data->exp->type.node_class != etree_value)
     {
@@ -4355,7 +4357,7 @@
 
   size = bfd_get_reloc_size (reloc->howto);
 
-  minfo ("0x%V %W RELOC %s ", addr, size, reloc->howto->name);
+  minfo ("0x%V %W RELOC %s ", addr, TO_ADDR(size), reloc->howto->name);
 
   if (reloc->name != NULL)
     minfo ("%s+", reloc->name);
@@ -4388,7 +4390,7 @@
   addr = s->output_offset;
   if (s->output_section != NULL)
     addr += s->output_section->vma;
-  minfo ("0x%V %W ", addr, (bfd_vma) s->size);
+  minfo ("0x%V %W ", addr, TO_ADDR((bfd_vma) s->size));
 
   if (s->fill->size != 0)
     {
@@ -5067,7 +5069,7 @@
 		   create overlapping LMAs.  */
 		if (dot < last->vma
 		    && os->bfd_section->size != 0
-		    && dot + os->bfd_section->size <= last->vma)
+		    && dot + TO_ADDR(os->bfd_section->size) <= last->vma)
 		  {
 		    /* If dot moved backwards then leave lma equal to
 		       vma.  This is the old default lma, which might
@@ -5084,7 +5086,7 @@
 		    /* If this is an overlay, set the current lma to that
 		       at the end of the previous section.  */
 		    if (os->sectype == overlay_section)
-		      lma = last->lma + last->size;
+		      lma = last->lma + TO_ADDR(last->size);
 
 		    /* Otherwise, keep the same lma to vma relationship
 		       as the previous section.  */


As I mentioned, this keeps the units of addresses and sizes consistent
within the map file.

Dan

On Thu, 2016-03-31 at 18:09 +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 08:04:44AM -0400, Dan wrote:
> > Don't forget the "minfo ("0x%V %W", section->vma ..." line that needs
> > its "section->size" parameter changed to TO_ADDR(section->size), or the
> > "lma = last->lma+last->size" that needs to be changed to "lma =
> > last->lma + TO_ADDR(last->size);".  At least according to my last git
> > pull, those changes still needed to be made as well.
> 
> Yes, there are other places missing TO_ADDR, and one of the minfo
> lines wrongly invokes TO_ADDR.  Thanks for the prod.
> 
> 	* ldlang.c (TO_ADDR, TO_SIZE, opb_shift): Move earlier in file.
> 	(lang_insert_orphan): Use TO_ADDR in __stop sym calculation.
> 	(print_input_section): Don't use TO_ADDR when printing section
> 	size.
> 	(lang_size_sections_1): Use TO_ADDR in overlay lma calculation.
> 	(lang_size_sections): Use TO_ADDR in relro end calculation.
> 
> diff --git a/ld/ldlang.c b/ld/ldlang.c
> index cb6aab6..9fca810 100644
> --- a/ld/ldlang.c
> +++ b/ld/ldlang.c
> @@ -49,7 +49,13 @@
>  #define offsetof(TYPE, MEMBER) ((size_t) & (((TYPE*) 0)->MEMBER))
>  #endif
>  
> -/* Locals variables.  */
> +/* Convert between addresses in bytes and sizes in octets.
> +   For currently supported targets, octets_per_byte is always a power
> +   of two, so we can use shifts.  */
> +#define TO_ADDR(X) ((X) >> opb_shift)
> +#define TO_SIZE(X) ((X) << opb_shift)
> +
> +/* Local variables.  */
>  static struct obstack stat_obstack;
>  static struct obstack map_obstack;
>  
> @@ -68,6 +74,7 @@ static lang_statement_list_type *stat_save[10];
>  static lang_statement_list_type **stat_save_ptr = &stat_save[0];
>  static struct unique_sections *unique_section_list;
>  static struct asneeded_minfo *asneeded_list_head;
> +static unsigned int opb_shift = 0;
>  static bfd_boolean maybe_overlays = FALSE;
>  
>  /* Forward declarations.  */
> @@ -1887,7 +1894,7 @@ lang_insert_orphan (asection *s,
>  	 before sizing dynamic sections.  */
>        dot = os->bfd_section->vma;
>        exp_fold_tree (start_assign->exp, os->bfd_section, &dot);
> -      dot += s->size;
> +      dot += TO_ADDR (s->size);
>        exp_fold_tree (stop_assign->exp, os->bfd_section, &dot);
>      }
>  
> @@ -3209,15 +3216,6 @@ ldlang_open_output (lang_statement_union_type *statement)
>      }
>  }
>  
> -/* Convert between addresses in bytes and sizes in octets.
> -   For currently supported targets, octets_per_byte is always a power
> -   of two, so we can use shifts.  */
> -#define TO_ADDR(X) ((X) >> opb_shift)
> -#define TO_SIZE(X) ((X) << opb_shift)
> -
> -/* Support the above.  */
> -static unsigned int opb_shift = 0;
> -
>  static void
>  init_opb (void)
>  {
> @@ -4225,7 +4223,7 @@ print_input_section (asection *i, bfd_boolean is_discarded)
>  	size = 0;
>      }
>  
> -  minfo ("0x%V %W %B\n", addr, TO_ADDR (size), i->owner);
> +  minfo ("0x%V %W %B\n", addr, size, i->owner);
>  
>    if (size != i->rawsize && i->rawsize != 0)
>      {
> @@ -5132,7 +5130,7 @@ lang_size_sections_1
>  		    /* If this is an overlay, set the current lma to that
>  		       at the end of the previous section.  */
>  		    if (os->sectype == overlay_section)
> -		      lma = last->lma + last->size;
> +		      lma = last->lma + TO_ADDR (last->size);
>  
>  		    /* Otherwise, keep the same lma to vma relationship
>  		       as the previous section.  */
> @@ -5524,7 +5522,7 @@ lang_size_sections (bfd_boolean *relax, bfd_boolean check_regions)
>  
>  	    end = start = sec->vma;
>  	    if (!IS_TBSS (sec))
> -	      end += sec->size;
> +	      end += TO_ADDR (sec->size);
>  	    bump = desired_end - end;
>  	    /* We'd like to increase START by BUMP, but we must heed
>  	       alignment so the increase might be less than optimum.  */
> 

Re: Missing TO_ADDR

[Alan Modra]

On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 07:12:46AM -0400, Dan wrote:
> Are you sure you want to take the TO_SIZE directives *away* from the
> minfo statements?  With the TO_SIZE directives, the addresses add up:
> last address plus size adds up to the next address, and you can see
> nothing missing.  Without the TO_SIZE directives, the units don't match.

You mean, TO_ADDR.  I understand your point and thought about
converting all the sizes to address units, but decided not to because
other places report octet sizes.  eg. rawsize in print_input_section,
and print_data_statement, print_reloc_statement,
print_padding_statement.  It seems likely that those functions bump
print_vma by the wrong amount too.

Hmm, I missed seeing that we have MEMORY region length in bytes, and
I'm not sure what the units are for symbol size in lang_one_common.

-- 
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM

Re: Missing TO_ADDR

[Alan Modra]

On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 12:03:17PM -0400, Dan wrote:
> This would be my proposal for what to change:

I'll approve a patch that is against current master, diff -up
preferred, and has a changelog.  Please repost.

-- 
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM

Re: [PATCH] Missing TO_ADDR

[Dan]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 747 bytes --]

Alan,

Sorry, I'm still kind of new to the whole idea of posting patches.  Will
this work better?

2016-04-01  Dan Gisselquist <dgisselq@ieee.org>

	* ld/ldlang.c: Updated minfo lines so that map file sizes are
	given in the target machines address units.
	* ld/ldlang.c: Fixed three other references to section sizes
	that didn't go through the size in octets to target address
	units translation

I used diff -Naur -up this time ...

(Rest of patch attached)


Dan


On Fri, 2016-04-01 at 12:01 +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 12:03:17PM -0400, Dan wrote:
> > This would be my proposal for what to change:
> 
> I'll approve a patch that is against current master, diff -up
> preferred, and has a changelog.  Please repost.
> 

[-- Attachment #2: patch.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3050 bytes --]

diff -Naur -up a/ld/ChangeLog b/ld/ChangeLog
--- a/ld/ChangeLog	2016-04-01 10:36:46.571415208 -0400
+++ b/ld/ChangeLog	2016-04-01 10:40:00.458440792 -0400
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+2016-04-01  Dan Gisselquist <dgisselq@ieee.org>
+
+	* ld/ldlang.c: Updated minfo lines so that map file sizes are
+	given in the target machines address units.
+	* ld/ldlang.c: Fixed three other references to section sizes
+	that didn't go through the size in octets to target address
+	units translation
+
 2016-02-23  H.J. Lu  <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
 
 	* testsuite/ld-frv/fdpic-pie-6.d: Updated.
diff -Naur -up a/ld/ldlang.c b/ld/ldlang.c
--- a/ld/ldlang.c	2016-03-31 11:52:02.147253098 -0400
+++ b/ld/ldlang.c	2016-03-31 12:01:13.039773821 -0400
@@ -1886,7 +1886,7 @@ lang_insert_orphan (asection *s,
 	 before sizing dynamic sections.  */
       dot = os->bfd_section->vma;
       exp_fold_tree (start_assign->exp, os->bfd_section, &dot);
-      dot += s->size;
+      dot += TO_ADDR(s->size);
       exp_fold_tree (stop_assign->exp, os->bfd_section, &dot);
     }
 
@@ -4002,7 +4002,7 @@ print_output_section_statement
 	      ++len;
 	    }
 
-	  minfo ("0x%V %W", section->vma, section->size);
+	  minfo ("0x%V %W", section->vma, TO_ADDR(section->size));
 
 	  if (section->vma != section->lma)
 	    minfo (_(" load address 0x%V"), section->lma);
@@ -4312,7 +4312,9 @@ print_data_statement (lang_data_statemen
       break;
     }
 
-  minfo ("0x%V %W %s 0x%v", addr, size, name, data->value);
+  if (size < TO_SIZE ((unsigned) 1))
+    size = TO_SIZE ((unsigned) 1);
+  minfo ("0x%V %W %s 0x%v", addr, TO_ADDR(size), name, data->value);
 
   if (data->exp->type.node_class != etree_value)
     {
@@ -4355,7 +4357,7 @@ print_reloc_statement (lang_reloc_statem
 
   size = bfd_get_reloc_size (reloc->howto);
 
-  minfo ("0x%V %W RELOC %s ", addr, size, reloc->howto->name);
+  minfo ("0x%V %W RELOC %s ", addr, TO_ADDR(size), reloc->howto->name);
 
   if (reloc->name != NULL)
     minfo ("%s+", reloc->name);
@@ -4388,7 +4390,7 @@ print_padding_statement (lang_padding_st
   addr = s->output_offset;
   if (s->output_section != NULL)
     addr += s->output_section->vma;
-  minfo ("0x%V %W ", addr, (bfd_vma) s->size);
+  minfo ("0x%V %W ", addr, TO_ADDR((bfd_vma) s->size));
 
   if (s->fill->size != 0)
     {
@@ -5067,7 +5069,7 @@ lang_size_sections_1
 		   create overlapping LMAs.  */
 		if (dot < last->vma
 		    && os->bfd_section->size != 0
-		    && dot + os->bfd_section->size <= last->vma)
+		    && dot + TO_ADDR(os->bfd_section->size) <= last->vma)
 		  {
 		    /* If dot moved backwards then leave lma equal to
 		       vma.  This is the old default lma, which might
@@ -5084,7 +5086,7 @@ lang_size_sections_1
 		    /* If this is an overlay, set the current lma to that
 		       at the end of the previous section.  */
 		    if (os->sectype == overlay_section)
-		      lma = last->lma + last->size;
+		      lma = last->lma + TO_ADDR(last->size);
 
 		    /* Otherwise, keep the same lma to vma relationship
 		       as the previous section.  */

Re: [PATCH] Missing TO_ADDR

[Alan Modra]

On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 10:42:08AM -0400, Dan wrote:
> Alan,
> 
> Sorry, I'm still kind of new to the whole idea of posting patches.  Will
> this work better?
> 
> 2016-04-01  Dan Gisselquist <dgisselq@ieee.org>
> 
> 	* ld/ldlang.c: Updated minfo lines so that map file sizes are
> 	given in the target machines address units.
> 	* ld/ldlang.c: Fixed three other references to section sizes
> 	that didn't go through the size in octets to target address
> 	units translation
> 
> I used diff -Naur -up this time ...

Thanks, but..

Hunk #1 FAILED at 1886.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 4001 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 4311 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 4356 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #5 succeeded at 4389 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #6 FAILED at 5069.
Hunk #7 FAILED at 5086.
3 out of 7 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file ld/ldlang.c.rej

..so I put it aside until I wasn't quite so busy.  The rejects turned
out to be due to me already committing those changes.  Here's what I
committed for you, and the style of changelog we use around here.

2016-04-08  Dan Gisselquist  <dgisselq@ieee.org>

	* ldlang.c (print_output_section_statement): Show minfo size
	in target machine address units.
	(print_reloc_statement): Likewise.
	(print_padding_statement): Likewise.
	(print_data_statement): Likewise.  Ensure minimum print_dot
	increment of one address unit.

diff --git a/ld/ldlang.c b/ld/ldlang.c
index 9fca810..5fbea3f 100644
--- a/ld/ldlang.c
+++ b/ld/ldlang.c
@@ -4001,7 +4001,7 @@ print_output_section_statement
 	      ++len;
 	    }
 
-	  minfo ("0x%V %W", section->vma, section->size);
+	  minfo ("0x%V %W", section->vma, TO_ADDR (section->size));
 
 	  if (section->vma != section->lma)
 	    minfo (_(" load address 0x%V"), section->lma);
@@ -4311,7 +4311,9 @@ print_data_statement (lang_data_statement_type *data)
       break;
     }
 
-  minfo ("0x%V %W %s 0x%v", addr, size, name, data->value);
+  if (size < TO_SIZE ((unsigned) 1))
+    size = TO_SIZE ((unsigned) 1);
+  minfo ("0x%V %W %s 0x%v", addr, TO_ADDR (size), name, data->value);
 
   if (data->exp->type.node_class != etree_value)
     {
@@ -4354,7 +4356,7 @@ print_reloc_statement (lang_reloc_statement_type *reloc)
 
   size = bfd_get_reloc_size (reloc->howto);
 
-  minfo ("0x%V %W RELOC %s ", addr, size, reloc->howto->name);
+  minfo ("0x%V %W RELOC %s ", addr, TO_ADDR (size), reloc->howto->name);
 
   if (reloc->name != NULL)
     minfo ("%s+", reloc->name);
@@ -4387,7 +4389,7 @@ print_padding_statement (lang_padding_statement_type *s)
   addr = s->output_offset;
   if (s->output_section != NULL)
     addr += s->output_section->vma;
-  minfo ("0x%V %W ", addr, (bfd_vma) s->size);
+  minfo ("0x%V %W ", addr, TO_ADDR (s->size));
 
   if (s->fill->size != 0)
     {

-- 
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM