From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-95801-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 64448 invoked by alias); 16 Feb 2017 20:13:36 -0000
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <binutils.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 64306 invoked by uid 89); 16 Feb 2017 20:13:35 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*MI:sk:e39ff45, H*i:sk:e39ff45, H*f:sk:e39ff45
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 20:13:34 +0000
Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24])	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))	(No client certificate requested)	by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 905D87E9E0;	Thu, 16 Feb 2017 20:13:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-221.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.221])	by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v1GKDVpD025296	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO);	Thu, 16 Feb 2017 15:13:33 -0500
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 20:13:00 -0000
From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>
Cc: binutils@sourceware.org, Victor Leschuk <vleschuk@accesssoftek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] DWARF attrs: add delimiter
Message-ID: <20170216201329.GA22230@host1.jankratochvil.net>
References: <148719947800.19826.950569475344047705.stgit@host1.jankratochvil.net> <e39ff456-6f60-ecb6-aa53-27e0713ff472@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <e39ff456-6f60-ecb6-aa53-27e0713ff472@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2017-02/txt/msg00163.txt.bz2

Hi Nick,

On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 11:59:10 +0100, Nick Clifton wrote:
> The patch looks good to me.  But ... I would be happier if it included
> a testcase to check the new functionality.

before coding it - is it OK do use x86_64 specific .s (and output .d) files
where .s is built with?
	-gdwarf-5 -S -dA

I understand an arch-independent .s file would be better but that would need
a lot of hand coding IMO.


Thanks,
Jan