Hi Nick,

On Fri, 17 Feb 2017 09:37:03 +0100, Nick Clifton wrote:
> > I understand an arch-independent .s file would be better but that would need
> > a lot of hand coding IMO.
> 
> Yes and no ... :-)
> 
> What I suggest is that you use "-gdwarf-5 -S -dA" to create the .s file.  Then
> strip any x86_64 instructions from it,

In the end it was not so much work but this is what I meant by that "a lot of
hand coding". :-)


> (Are there any architecture specific parts of the new standard ?)

No, I am not aware of any.


> PS.  If you a potential test case, but you do not want to spin up 200+ toolchains to
> test all of the potential targets then feel free to send it to me.  I already have
> the toolchains set up and I can quickly run the new test past them all...

Feel free to throw the results at me.  I have already tested non-x86 big-endian.


Thanks,
Jan