From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 40105 invoked by alias); 7 Mar 2017 09:11:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 40080 invoked by uid 89); 7 Mar 2017 09:11:49 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-spam-relays-external:ESMTPA X-HELO: out1-smtp.messagingengine.com Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (HELO out1-smtp.messagingengine.com) (66.111.4.25) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 09:11:48 +0000 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEB05206CC; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 04:11:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 07 Mar 2017 04:11:47 -0500 X-ME-Sender: Received: from localhost (106-69-202-218.dyn.iinet.net.au [106.69.202.218]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3D94724066; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 04:11:47 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 09:11:00 -0000 From: "Tobin C. Harding" To: Pierre Muller Cc: 'Alan Modra' , binutils@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND] Document .Nbyte assembler directives Message-ID: <20170307091144.GB12269@eros> References: <1488779886-26753-1-git-send-email-me@tobin.cc> <007601d296bd$3b5f1c80$b21d5580$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <007601d296bd$3b5f1c80$b21d5580$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-03/txt/msg00088.txt.bz2 On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 10:04:20PM +0100, Pierre Muller wrote: > Hi all, > > I am just curious about what I read in your documentation improvement. > > You state that, for .8byte > there is a warning if the bignum doesn't fit into an 8 byte integer, > but there is nothing similar for .2byte and .4byte. Good catch, thanks. There are warnings for .2byte and .4byte also. Attempting to patch it now. thanks, Tobin.