From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13973 invoked by alias); 24 Feb 2020 23:41:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 13964 invoked by uid 89); 24 Feb 2020 23:41:02 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=H*i:sk:CAMe9rO, HX-Languages-Length:515 X-HELO: mail-pf1-f195.google.com Received: from mail-pf1-f195.google.com (HELO mail-pf1-f195.google.com) (209.85.210.195) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 23:41:01 +0000 Received: by mail-pf1-f195.google.com with SMTP id k29so6155215pfp.13 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 15:41:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=XULE8TxynWoyyQvNcN9/434xYdnM8zvH4F4f0w7EtiM=; b=EzHwxf5cVNgjl5a49rRrY+oXSRnQL86/FRQeX3dug/vkbMCflLvHfRVUTRI6QbIP1u Pd6/T88Up11MyXj7y2BbaqkvgpKtVsb44L2ZMRP/QZX+lLcoZIe7cpOoz7kfHxZkUFZx DvB0FXrS360NBx4VxWTOiTWbU829kpsV5C8cT9y5/mdsTRerAcw8Lt4fO7K8nCkd5yvl 2gfXCLBkD1wJj1Hj1aj9ldPpy2bcUWBDmI7Gd6XJY1rZv69Eo7EYcBg2O6p42LxpOVqs yGIyYzYc7c7+3G6s4p/IVyNQNi+bzms27O5o0c2ePoYF0dFsr+1bNgGyghtplnNcagXq frDg== Return-Path: Received: from bubble.grove.modra.org ([2406:3400:51d:8cc0:88ce:e10f:4c46:c44]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l10sm600998pjy.5.2020.02.24.15.40.58 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 24 Feb 2020 15:40:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by bubble.grove.modra.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8AA7689FE8; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 10:10:55 +1030 (ACDT) Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 23:41:00 -0000 From: Alan Modra To: "H.J. Lu" Cc: Binutils , Nick Clifton Subject: Re: [PATCH] Don't call lto-wrapper for ar and ranlib Message-ID: <20200224234055.GF5570@bubble.grove.modra.org> References: <20200221132043.275391-1-hjl.tools@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2020-02/txt/msg00533.txt.bz2 On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 04:58:40AM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote: > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 5:20 AM H.J. Lu wrote: > > > > Since ar and ranlib don't need to know symbol types to work properly, > > we should avoid calling lto-wrapper for them to speed them up. > > Nick, Alan, is this patch OK for master? Looks OK to me for both master and 2.34. > Nick, is this patch OK for backport to 2.34 branch? -- Alan Modra Australia Development Lab, IBM