From: Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>
To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Binutils <binutils@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] bfd: refine handling of relocations between debugging sections
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 21:53:54 +1030 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210309112354.GJ6042@bubble.grove.modra.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ef7db6dd-6186-5232-d344-2138771d3fd8@suse.com>
On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 08:46:08AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 09.03.2021 03:24, Alan Modra wrote:
> > @@ -1323,6 +1322,19 @@ bfd_elf_generic_reloc (bfd *abfd ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
> > return bfd_reloc_ok;
> > }
> >
> > + /* In some cases the relocation should be treated as input section
> > + relative, as when linking ELF DWARF into PE COFF. Many ELF
> > + targets lack section relative relocations and instead use
> > + ordinary absolute relocations for references between DWARF
> > + sections. That is arguably a bug in those targets but it happens
> > + to work for the usual case of linking to non-loaded ELF debug
> > + sections with VMAs forced to zero. PE COFF on the other hand
> > + doesn't allow a section VMA of zero. */
> > + if (output_bfd == NULL
> > + && (symbol->section->flags & SEC_DEBUGGING) != 0
> > + && (input_section->flags & SEC_DEBUGGING) != 0)
> > + reloc_entry->addend -= symbol->section->output_section->vma;
>
> ... already in your reduced replacement suggestion to my change
> to bfd_perform_relocation() you didn't only drop the "just to
> be on the safe side" checks, but also the pc-relative one. Are
> you sure there aren't any cases where such relocations might be
> used, particularly when the relocation points back to the same
> section?
I'm aware of DW_OP_skip, DW_OP_bra, DW_OP_call[24] that use relative
offsets to the same section. I figured these ought to resolve at
assembly time and thus not have relocations. But I suppose some
targets might emit needless relocs, so yes, I'll put the pc-relative
test back.
--
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-09 11:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-02 9:46 [PATCH 0/6] PE/COFF linking adjustments Jan Beulich
2021-03-02 9:47 ` [PATCH 1/6] ld: don't generate base relocations in PE output for absolute symbols Jan Beulich
2021-03-02 13:30 ` Jan Beulich
2021-03-04 4:46 ` Alan Modra
2021-03-04 8:52 ` Jan Beulich
2021-03-04 13:16 ` Alan Modra
2021-03-05 12:49 ` Alan Modra
2021-03-05 13:38 ` Jan Beulich
2021-03-05 13:59 ` Alan Modra
2021-03-02 9:47 ` [PATCH 2/6] bfd: prune COFF/PE section flags setting Jan Beulich
2021-03-04 4:47 ` Alan Modra
2021-03-02 9:48 ` [PATCH 3/6] bfd: refine handling of relocations between debugging sections Jan Beulich
2021-03-04 6:10 ` Alan Modra
2021-03-04 9:00 ` Jan Beulich
2021-03-05 12:00 ` Alan Modra
2021-03-08 14:17 ` Jan Beulich
2021-03-09 2:24 ` Alan Modra
2021-03-09 7:46 ` Jan Beulich
2021-03-09 11:23 ` Alan Modra [this message]
2021-03-09 12:49 ` Jan Beulich
2021-03-02 9:49 ` [PATCH 4/6] ld: adjust ld-scripts/map-address.* Jan Beulich
2021-03-04 6:10 ` Alan Modra
2021-03-02 9:49 ` [PATCH 5/6] bfd: don't silently wrap or truncate PE image section RVAs Jan Beulich
2021-03-04 6:13 ` Alan Modra
2021-03-02 9:50 ` [PATCH 6/6] bfd: strip symbols not representable in COFF/PE symbol table Jan Beulich
2021-03-04 6:15 ` Alan Modra
2021-03-04 9:06 ` Jan Beulich
2021-03-04 13:27 ` Alan Modra
2021-03-08 15:05 ` Jan Beulich
2021-03-08 16:11 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210309112354.GJ6042@bubble.grove.modra.org \
--to=amodra@gmail.com \
--cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).