* [PATCH] x86-64: Test protected function pointers
@ 2021-06-17 17:16 H.J. Lu
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: H.J. Lu @ 2021-06-17 17:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: binutils
On x86-64, function pointers in executable for external funtions may be
resolved to their PLT entries in executable. If it happens, function
pointers of protected funtions in shared libraries must be resolved to
the PLT entries in executable, not addresses of protected funtions in
shared libraries.
* testsuite/ld-x86-64/x86-64.exp: Run protected function tests.
* testsuite/ld-x86-64/protected-func-1.h: New file.
* testsuite/ld-x86-64/protected-func-1a.s: Likewise.
* testsuite/ld-x86-64/protected-func-1b.c: Likewise.
---
ld/testsuite/ld-x86-64/protected-func-1.h | 6 +++
ld/testsuite/ld-x86-64/protected-func-1a.s | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++
ld/testsuite/ld-x86-64/protected-func-1b.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++
ld/testsuite/ld-x86-64/x86-64.exp | 25 +++++++++++
4 files changed, 114 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 ld/testsuite/ld-x86-64/protected-func-1.h
create mode 100644 ld/testsuite/ld-x86-64/protected-func-1a.s
create mode 100644 ld/testsuite/ld-x86-64/protected-func-1b.c
diff --git a/ld/testsuite/ld-x86-64/protected-func-1.h b/ld/testsuite/ld-x86-64/protected-func-1.h
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..b5ff4e8f822
--- /dev/null
+++ b/ld/testsuite/ld-x86-64/protected-func-1.h
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+extern int protected_func_1a (void);
+extern int protected_func_1b (void);
+
+typedef int (*protected_func_type) (void);
+extern protected_func_type protected_func_1a_p (void);
+extern protected_func_type protected_func_1b_p (void);
diff --git a/ld/testsuite/ld-x86-64/protected-func-1a.s b/ld/testsuite/ld-x86-64/protected-func-1a.s
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..eb2ed91fb52
--- /dev/null
+++ b/ld/testsuite/ld-x86-64/protected-func-1a.s
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+ .text
+ .p2align 4
+ .protected protected_func_1a
+ .globl protected_func_1a
+ .type protected_func_1a, @function
+protected_func_1a:
+.LFB0:
+ .cfi_startproc
+ movl $1, %eax
+ ret
+ .cfi_endproc
+.LFE0:
+ .size protected_func_1a, .-protected_func_1a
+ .p2align 4
+ .protected protected_func_1b
+ .globl protected_func_1b
+ .type protected_func_1b, @function
+protected_func_1b:
+.LFB1:
+ .cfi_startproc
+ movl $2, %eax
+ ret
+ .cfi_endproc
+.LFE1:
+ .size protected_func_1b, .-protected_func_1b
+ .p2align 4
+ .globl protected_func_1a_p
+ .type protected_func_1a_p, @function
+protected_func_1a_p:
+.LFB2:
+ .cfi_startproc
+ movq protected_func_1a@GOTPCREL(%rip), %rax
+ ret
+ .cfi_endproc
+.LFE2:
+ .size protected_func_1a_p, .-protected_func_1a_p
+ .p2align 4
+ .globl protected_func_1b_p
+ .type protected_func_1b_p, @function
+protected_func_1b_p:
+.LFB3:
+ .cfi_startproc
+ movq protected_func_1b@GOTPCREL(%rip), %rax
+ ret
+ .cfi_endproc
+.LFE3:
+ .size protected_func_1b_p, .-protected_func_1b_p
+ .section .note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits
diff --git a/ld/testsuite/ld-x86-64/protected-func-1b.c b/ld/testsuite/ld-x86-64/protected-func-1b.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..a9d728afe24
--- /dev/null
+++ b/ld/testsuite/ld-x86-64/protected-func-1b.c
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+#include <stdio.h>
+
+#include "protected-func-1.h"
+
+int
+protected_func_1b (void)
+{
+ return 3;
+}
+
+int
+main (void)
+{
+ int res = 0;
+
+ /* Check if we get the same address for the protected function symbol. */
+ if (protected_func_1a != protected_func_1a_p ())
+ {
+ puts ("'protected_func_1a' in main and shared library doesn't have same address");
+ res = 1;
+ }
+
+ /* Check if we get the different addresses for the protected function
+ symbol. */
+ if (protected_func_1b == protected_func_1b_p ())
+ {
+ puts ("'protected_func_1b' in main and shared library has same address");
+ res = 1;
+ }
+
+ if (!res)
+ puts ("PASS");
+
+ return res;
+}
diff --git a/ld/testsuite/ld-x86-64/x86-64.exp b/ld/testsuite/ld-x86-64/x86-64.exp
index 80716668df6..5dc9a1c218e 100644
--- a/ld/testsuite/ld-x86-64/x86-64.exp
+++ b/ld/testsuite/ld-x86-64/x86-64.exp
@@ -1321,6 +1321,14 @@ if { [isnative] && [check_compiler_available] } {
{readelf -rW pr22842b.rd}} \
"pr22842" \
] \
+ [list \
+ "Build libprotected-func-1.so" \
+ "-shared" \
+ "-fPIC -Wa,-mx86-used-note=yes" \
+ { protected-func-1a.s } \
+ {} \
+ "libprotected-func-1.so" \
+ ] \
]
if {[istarget "x86_64-*-linux*-gnux32"]} {
@@ -1730,6 +1738,23 @@ if { [isnative] && [check_compiler_available] } {
"pr23997" \
"pass.out" \
] \
+ [list \
+ "Run protected-func-1 without PIE" \
+ "-Wl,--no-as-needed tmpdir/libprotected-func-1.so" \
+ "-Wa,-mx86-used-note=yes" \
+ { protected-func-1b.c } \
+ "protected-func-1a" \
+ "pass.out" \
+ ] \
+ [list \
+ "Run protected-func-1 with PIE" \
+ "-Wl,--no-as-needed -pie tmpdir/libprotected-func-1.so" \
+ "-Wa,-mx86-used-note=yes" \
+ { protected-func-1b.c } \
+ "protected-func-1b" \
+ "pass.out" \
+ "-fPIE" \
+ ] \
]
# Run-time tests which require working ifunc attribute support.
--
2.31.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2021-06-17 17:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-06-17 17:16 [PATCH] x86-64: Test protected function pointers H.J. Lu
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).