From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cgf.cx (external.cgf.cx [107.170.62.102]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8211A3857B80; Thu, 6 Oct 2022 20:12:58 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 8211A3857B80 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=sourceware.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cgf.cx X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 cgf.cx 2A128E0E30 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-CGF-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 spammy=Tokens not available. Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2022 16:12:56 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: Mark Wielaard Cc: Overseers mailing list , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org, gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: The GNU Toolchain Infrastructure Project Message-ID: <20221006201256.run7acqpnjofsqfw@cgf.cx> Mail-Followup-To: Mark Wielaard , Overseers mailing list , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org, gdb@sourceware.org References: <6f6d141b-b776-8707-2c91-dc38d20aa9e1@gotplt.org> <20221004171007.oc2ot6eu6l24aipn@cgf.cx> <05b0f7fa-7077-5a8b-0c2f-dfb3068dd10f@gotplt.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP,USER_IN_WELCOMELIST,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 List-Id: On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 10:02:19PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: >...But it would be really nice to hear directly from the Linux >Foundation and the OpenSSF about what exactly they are proposing, which >parts of the proposal are mandatory, which can be mixed and matched, >and how they see this working together with Sourceware becoming a >Software Freedom Conservancy member project. Indeed. The silence from the proponents of this project is puzzling. I wonder if this means there are more non-public negotiations going on somewhere, leaving the community out of the loop. cgf