From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gnu.wildebeest.org (gnu.wildebeest.org [45.83.234.184]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 957973857B9B for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2023 00:25:45 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 957973857B9B Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=klomp.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=klomp.org Received: by gnu.wildebeest.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 94ECE313ACA3; Thu, 8 Jun 2023 02:25:44 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2023 02:25:44 +0200 From: Mark Wielaard To: Indu Bhagat Cc: Sam James , binutils@sourceware.org Subject: Re: =?utf-8?B?4pigIEJ1aWxkYm8=?= =?utf-8?Q?t?= (Sourceware): binutils-gdb - failed test (failure) (master) Message-ID: <20230608002544.GB27902@gnu.wildebeest.org> References: <20230607225840.3DA8F38582BD@sourceware.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3029.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Hi Indu, Hi Sam, On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 05:08:45PM -0700, Indu Bhagat wrote: > On 6/7/23 3:58 PM, builder--- via Binutils wrote: > >A new failure has been detected on builder binutils-gentoo-sparc while building binutils-gdb. > > > >Full details are available at: > > https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#builders/228/builds/828 > > > >Build state: failed test (failure) > >Revision: 676cb9d2e019685a357a02b7a15999e7c3414de2 > >Worker: gentoo-sparc > >Build Reason: (unknown) > >Blamelist: Indu Bhagat , Tom Tromey > > > >Steps: > > [...] > >- 5: make check ( failure ) > > Logs: > > - stdio: https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#builders/228/builds/828/steps/5/logs/stdio > > - ld.sum: https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#builders/228/builds/828/steps/5/logs/ld_sum > > - ld.log: https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#builders/228/builds/828/steps/5/logs/ld_log > > - gas.sum: https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#builders/228/builds/828/steps/5/logs/gas_sum > > - gas.log: https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#builders/228/builds/828/steps/5/logs/gas_log > > - binutils.sum: https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#builders/228/builds/828/steps/5/logs/binutils_sum > > - binutils.log: https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#builders/228/builds/828/steps/5/logs/binutils_log > > - libsframe.sum: https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#builders/228/builds/828/steps/5/logs/libsframe_sum > > - libsframe.log: https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#builders/228/builds/828/steps/5/logs/libsframe_log > > - libctf.sum: https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#builders/228/builds/828/steps/5/logs/libctf_sum > > - libctf.log: https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#builders/228/builds/828/steps/5/logs/libctf_log > > - warnings (12): https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#builders/228/builds/828/steps/5/logs/warnings__12_ > > > > Its not clear where the failure is. I see that the binutils.log and > binutils.sum file look truncated. I suspect some issue with the run > / node ? Yes, I think so. I note that the next build on sparc is green: https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#/builders/228/builds/829 And that was just the "Automatic date update in version.in" change. Sam, can you see or do you know why the sparc builder had this hickup? Cheers, Mark