From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.loongson.cn (mail.loongson.cn [114.242.206.163]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 991FC3858D20 for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 02:22:25 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 991FC3858D20 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=loongson.cn Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=loongson.cn Received: from loongson.cn (unknown [111.9.175.10]) by gateway (Coremail) with SMTP id _____8Dxg_DdSdRkfksUAA--.44273S3; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 10:22:22 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [111.9.175.10]) by localhost.localdomain (Coremail) with SMTP id AQAAf8AxzyPcSdRks0ZSAA--.33900S2; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 10:22:21 +0800 (CST) From: Jinyang He To: Nick Clifton , mengqinggang Cc: binutils@sourceware.org, Xing Li , Xi Ruoyao Subject: [PATCH] Make sure DW_CFA_advance_loc4 is in the same frag Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 10:21:40 +0800 Message-Id: <20230810022140.3030-1-hejinyang@loongson.cn> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CM-TRANSID:AQAAf8AxzyPcSdRks0ZSAA--.33900S2 X-CM-SenderInfo: pkhmx0p1dqwqxorr0wxvrqhubq/ X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Uk129KBj9xXoWrKryfXw45KFykur17ZF1rZrc_yoWDGFc_WF yUZw48Z34xG39rX3ZrCF45G3ySqF10gF4DuFZruryUZw15Grs8AFykXry5KF45u3y0gr93 Jw45Gryru3W2gosvyTuYvTs0mTUanT9S1TB71UUUUU7qnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUj1kv1TuYvT s0mT0YCTnIWjqI5I8CrVACY4xI64kE6c02F40Ex7xfYxn0WfASr-VFAUDa7-sFnT9fnUUI cSsGvfJTRUUUb78YFVCjjxCrM7AC8VAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1l1xkIjI8I6I8E6xAIw20EY4v20x vaj40_Wr0E3s1l1IIY67AEw4v_JrI_Jryl8cAvFVAK0II2c7xJM28CjxkF64kEwVA0rcxS w2x7M28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUCwA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxV WUJVW8JwA2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIE14v26r4j6F4UM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVW8 JVW8Jr1le2I262IYc4CY6c8Ij28IcVAaY2xG8wAqjxCEc2xF0cIa020Ex4CE44I27wAqx4 xG64xvF2IEw4CE5I8CrVC2j2WlYx0E2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_JrI_JrylYx0Ex4A2jsIE14v2 6r1j6r4UMcvjeVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJVW8JwACjcxG0xvY0x0EwIxGrwCF04k20xvY0x0EwI xGrwCFx2IqxVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJVW8JwC20s026c02F40E14v26r1j6r18MI8I3I0E7480 Y4vE14v26r106r1rMI8E67AF67kF1VAFwI0_JF0_Jw1lIxkGc2Ij64vIr41lIxAIcVC0I7 IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUCwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lIxAIcVCF04k2 6cxKx2IYs7xG6r1j6r1xMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIE14v26r1j6r4UMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIEc7CjxV AFwI0_Jr0_GrUvcSsGvfC2KfnxnUUI43ZEXa7IU1EksDUUUUU== X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,GIT_PATCH_0,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: The DW_CFA_advance_loc4 may be in different frags. Then fr_fix may caused something wrong. Referenced by commit b9d8f5601bcf ("Re: Optimise away eh_frame advance_loc 0"). gas/ChangeLog: * ehopt.c (check_eh_frame): Don't allow DW_CFA_advance_loc4 to be placed in a different frag to the rs_cfa. --- BTW, it is a bug I triggered when compiling a LoongArch.asm file with relaxation being enabled. I hope it could be merged to 2.41 as bug-fix. gas/ehopt.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gas/ehopt.c b/gas/ehopt.c index feea61b92..9d6606adf 100644 --- a/gas/ehopt.c +++ b/gas/ehopt.c @@ -386,7 +386,7 @@ check_eh_frame (expressionS *exp, unsigned int *pnbytes) { /* This might be a DW_CFA_advance_loc4. Record the frag and the position within the frag, so that we can change it later. */ - frag_grow (1); + frag_grow (1 + 4); d->state = state_saw_loc4; d->loc4_frag = frag_now; d->loc4_fix = frag_now_fix (); -- 2.34.3