public inbox for binutils@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>
To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>, Binutils <binutils@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: ☠ Buildbot (Sourceware): binutils-gdb - failed test (failure) (master)
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2023 10:57:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230821085756.GF16919@gnu.wildebeest.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c42fa380-1385-4114-ed53-e9e68b4dc096@suse.com>

Hi Jan (added Sam to CC),

On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 08:25:23AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 18.08.2023 23:54, builder@sourceware.org wrote:
> > A new failure has been detected on builder binutils-gentoo-sparc while building binutils-gdb.
> > 
> > Full details are available at:
> >     https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#builders/228/builds/1142
> > 
> > Build state: failed test (failure)
> > Revision: b41ef0baac449de58c84d1a0261af0d91443b540
> > Worker: gentoo-sparc
> > Build Reason: (unknown)
> > Blamelist: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
> > 
> > Steps:
> [...]
> > - 5: make check ( failure )
> >     Logs:
> >         - stdio: https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#builders/228/builds/1142/steps/5/logs/stdio
> 
> Looking just here - where's the failure indication, other than an unhelpful
> "timed out"? (I believe this isn't the first time I'm observing such a
> report.)

Clearly something hung in the testsuite. Sometimes you can find
additional logs in the full build steps here:

https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#builders/228/builds/1142

And if that doesn't give a clue (it doesn't in this case), you can
look for the Upload to bunsen step, which contains an URL to the
bunsen entry containing all log files and full results, in this case:

https://builder.sourceware.org/testrun/02dd95c110a6d72025efd682e0614fac3bd7ee13

The filelist normally contains some logs that can be helpful.

But I don't see anything specific in this case either.  So then we ask
the person running the buildbot sparc builder, which is Sam (CCed).

All the builds after this one seem green. So maybe the buildbot worker
was just really slow?

Cheers,

Mark

  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-21  8:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20230818215458.6F9403858D32@sourceware.org>
2023-08-21  6:25 ` Jan Beulich
2023-08-21  8:57   ` Mark Wielaard [this message]
2024-04-27  1:03 builder
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-04-20  1:18 builder
2024-04-19 22:16 builder
2024-04-19  3:32 builder
2024-04-12  6:06 builder
2024-04-03 20:45 builder
2024-02-27  5:20 builder
2024-02-27  5:03 builder
2024-01-26 12:15 builder
2024-01-10 12:28 builder
2023-12-29 12:19 builder
2023-12-29  4:32 builder
2023-12-29  3:57 builder
2023-12-29  3:47 builder
2023-12-13  6:51 builder
2023-10-13  0:42 builder
2023-10-16  6:48 ` Jan Beulich
2023-10-19 11:23   ` Mark Wielaard
2023-10-19 11:48     ` Jan Beulich
2023-10-10 12:24 builder
2023-10-09 17:33 builder
2023-10-08  3:07 builder
2023-10-06  0:36 builder
2023-10-05 14:02 builder
2023-10-03  0:40 builder
2023-09-29 15:32 builder
2023-09-29  0:36 builder
2023-09-27 17:01 builder
2023-09-27  9:53 builder
2023-09-26 14:41 builder
2023-09-18  8:14 builder
2023-09-18  9:04 ` Sam James
     [not found] <20230914084342.10CE138555A9@sourceware.org>
2023-09-14  8:58 ` Jan Beulich
2023-09-14 18:33   ` Mark Wielaard
2023-09-14  8:43 builder
2023-08-18 21:54 builder
2023-08-01 14:33 builder
2023-07-17 20:31 builder
2023-07-17 16:50 builder
2023-07-17  8:19 builder
2023-07-07 10:47 builder
     [not found] <20230704171241.36F7E3858C31@sourceware.org>
2023-07-05  7:19 ` Jan Beulich
2023-07-05  9:39   ` Mark Wielaard
2023-07-04 17:12 builder
2023-06-30  5:04 builder
2023-06-29 20:25 builder
2023-06-27 23:59 builder
2023-06-14  5:36 builder
2023-06-11  0:39 builder
2023-06-07 22:58 builder
2023-06-08  0:08 ` Indu Bhagat
2023-06-08  0:25   ` Mark Wielaard
     [not found] <20230530134911.4B9523858D28@sourceware.org>
2023-06-06  7:02 ` mengqinggang
2023-06-05 16:17 builder
2023-06-05  4:39 builder
2023-05-30 13:49 builder
2023-05-30  5:12 builder
2023-05-19  7:36 builder
2023-05-07  0:40 builder
2023-05-03 15:12 builder
2023-05-03  6:48 builder
2023-03-07 15:07 builder
2023-03-05  0:19 builder

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230821085756.GF16919@gnu.wildebeest.org \
    --to=mark@klomp.org \
    --cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=sam@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).