From: Geoff Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org>
To: davidm@hpl.hp.com
Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com, davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com
Subject: Re: curious check in dwarf2_gen_line_info()
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 18:32:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2478F3AA-59C8-11D9-937B-000A95B1F520@geoffk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16850.33143.199264.751617@napali.hpl.hp.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2752 bytes --]
On 29/12/2004, at 2:05 AM, David Mosberger wrote:
> [Resend^2: I mistakenly typed .com instead of .org for his domain...
> ;-( ]
>
> In dwarf2dbg.c:dwarf2_gen_line_info(), one finds this curious code and
> comment:
>
> /* Don't emit sequences of line symbols for the same line when the
> symbols apply to assembler code. It is necessary to emit
> duplicate line symbols when a compiler asks for them, because GDB
> uses them to determine the end of the prologue. */
> if (debug_type == DEBUG_DWARF2
> && line == loc->line && filenum == loc->filenum)
> return;
>
> The "debug_type == DEBUG_DWARF2" checks has the effect that for
> compiler-generated files, the line info is replicated for each
> instruction, even when that info doesn't change at all.
>
> The change seems to have been introduced back in 2002:
>
> 2002-04-17 Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@redhat.com>
> * dwarf2dbg.c (dwarf2_gen_line_info): Do emit duplicate line
> numbers, gdb relies on them to detect the start of the
> prologue.
>
> but there is no hint on which platform needed this workaround.
My understanding is that it was needed on all platforms. It's used
when the user writes
break foo
in GDB, to break after foo's prologue, rather than on its first
instruction. As I wrote in 2002,
> GDB uses duplicate line numbers to detect the end of the prologue.
> GCC would carefully emit them... and gas was stripping them out.
>
> I don't believe this patch will significantly affect the size of the
> debug info for assembler source, because having multiple instructions
> on a line is rare.
>
> I tested this by running the GAS and GDB testsuites on
> powerpc-eabisim.
[the patch was later revised to not apply to assembler source.]
Maybe the GDB people have implemented some other technique for this, in
which case it could go away. Running the GDB testsuite should show the
problem. (Actually, IMO, the whole thing is wrong; GDB really should
be breaking on the first instruction. The problem with that is that
GCC+GDB isn't smart enough to permit the user to print the contents of
incoming arguments at a breakpoint on the first instruction of a
routine, it needs the prologue to be executed. It would be very cool
to fix that.)
This is not a change that should be first made in the assembler.
Instead of having the compiler emit duplicates and have the assembler
remove them, the compiler should be changed to not emit duplicates in
the first place if they are no longer needed.
The overhead of the duplicates should not be very significant (compared
to the information that is required), because the compiler should
already be suppressing duplicate line information except where it is
needed.
[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 2410 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-29 18:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-29 10:06 David Mosberger
2004-12-29 18:32 ` Geoff Keating [this message]
2004-12-29 18:51 ` David Mosberger
2004-12-29 19:01 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-31 2:16 ` David Mosberger
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-12-29 10:02 David Mosberger
2004-12-29 10:00 David Mosberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2478F3AA-59C8-11D9-937B-000A95B1F520@geoffk.org \
--to=geoffk@geoffk.org \
--cc=binutils@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=davidm@hpl.hp.com \
--cc=davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).